It would work. Multicast doesnt indicate anything more than more than one destination. Those destinations could be two JMS queues, a queue and a log, whatever you like. All your code would do is log the message but if that is what you want then go for it.
*Robert Simmons Jr. MSc. - Lead Java Architect @ EA* *Author of: Hardcore Java (2003) and Maintainable Java (2012)* *LinkedIn: **http://www.linkedin.com/pub/robert-simmons/40/852/a39* On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Christian Müller < christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote: > This doesn't sounds right. > Can you provide a unit test which shows this behavior and attach it to a > JIRA [1]!? > > [1] http://camel.apache.org/contributing.html > > Best, > Christian > ----------------- > > Software Integration Specialist > > Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team > V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/ > Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html > > https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642 > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:28 PM, arunodhaya80 <t...@arunma.com> wrote: > > > Please excuse stupidity as this is my first Camel application > > > > 1. To respond to a web request, I am sourcing the content from two > > different > > sources. > > 2. I am, therefore, making a multicast request to two methods and > > parallelizing it. > > 3. The response is an marshalled JSON object (using camel-jackson) > > > > All works fine. > > > > public class RestToBeanRouter extends RouteBuilder{ > > > > @Override > > public void configure() throws Exception { > > > > from("cxfrs://bean://rsServer") > > > > .multicast() > > .parallelProcessing() > > .aggregationStrategy(new CoreSearchResponseAggregator()) > > .beanRef("searchRestServiceImpl", "firstMethod") > > .beanRef("searchRestServiceImpl", "secondMethod") > > .end() > > .marshal().json(JsonLibrary.Jackson) > > .to("log://camelLogger?level=DEBUG"); > > > > } > > > > > > **Question :** > > > > The Multicast routing expects a `to` in the DSL. Currently, I am mapping > > this to a `log` endpoint. Is this fine? > > > > Since I am not using the `to` and the last exchange of the Aggregator > > strategy is the one which is returned to the user, should my endpoint be > > configured to something else - like a null or something? (Ah, the > stupidity > > kicks in) > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Apache-Camel-Multicast-Is-there-a-null-or-a-similar-endpoint-tp5740664.html > > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
