The question is which one of the DSL implementation you want to use when you are going to use camel+jboss fuse based implementation. My points are: 1.Blueprints(similar to spring DM) are best supported in osgi based environments. 2. XML s not only reduce the number of classes but also if working in jboss dev studio gives you a chance to graphically design your routes through visual editor. 3.Configuration in XML never requires recompilation and can be easily understood by any person who understands the basics of xml. 4.At runtime its all on camel based components irrespective of java DSL or spring DSL.
My concerns: Does using xmls/spring DSLs really give you any maintenance problems? Does choice of DSL really matter or it just depends upon the developers/technical team's capability to find the comfort-ability? Please give your points as we have two groups in teams where one group is supporting java DSL other is SPRING based one. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Blueprint-Spring-DSL-vs-JAVA-DSL-tp5781807.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
