I doubt if you'll see any issues with either approach. It is more a matter of preference, taste and what works well for you.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Vanshul.Chawla <vanshul.cha...@target.com> wrote: > We are using XML DSL and xslt for transformation. > We don't see any issue so far for any of our applications. > > -----Original Message----- > From: NikheelRanjan [mailto:nikheel.ran...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 3:05 AM > To: users@camel.apache.org > Subject: Re: Blueprint(Spring) DSL vs JAVA DSL > > I also have good amount of experience in IT and I am using camel for more > than 4 years, I also recommend xml and blueprint as the standard.As far as > complexity is concerned,Routes placed in JAVA DSL will not help rather use > of camel processors/beans will help in between to handle the complexity in > a better way. > Please give ur thoughts on if any body see xml DSL plus use of camel > processors in between to handle complex tasks as a challenge in handling > big applications and do you think that JAVA DSL has any advantage over it? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Blueprint-Spring-DSL-vs-JAVA-DSL-tp5781807p5781956.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
