There is an issue with local storage as well. Looks like there was change in 
the storage_pool table where the available_bytes column was changed to 
used_bytes but in the code available bytes was still passed for used bytes for 
local storage.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id]
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 10:29 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: guangj...@gmail.com; Wido den Hollander
> Subject: Re: Wrong storage capacity issue reported
> 
> Hi Prasanna,
> 
> Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
> 
> See my reply inline below.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Prasanna Santhanam <t...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:58:47AM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > In addition to my previous e-mail, I just realised that the wrong
> > capacity
> > > usage information is only applicable to the Ceph RBD primary
> > > storage. I
> > did
> > > a check manually on the "storage_pool" table on the "cloud" MySQL
> > database:
> > >
> > >
> > +-----+-----------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------+----
> --+----------------+--------+------------+-------------------+----------------+-----------
> ----------------+------------------------------------------------+------------------------+-
> --------------------+---------------------+-------------+-------------+--------------------
> -+-------+
> > > | id  | name            | uuid                                 |
> > > pool_type         | port | data_center_id | pod_id | cluster_id |
> > > available_bytes   | capacity_bytes | host_address              |
> > > user_info                                      | path                   |
> > > created             | removed             | update_time | status      |
> > > storage_provider_id | scope |
> > >
> > +-----+-----------------+--------------------------------------+-------------------+----
> --+----------------+--------+------------+-------------------+----------------+-----------
> ----------------+------------------------------------------------+------------------------+-
> --------------------+---------------------+-------------+-------------+--------------------
> -+-------+
> > > | 209 | sc-image        | bab81ce8-d53f-3a7d-b8f6-841702f65c89 |
> > > RBD               | 6789 |              6 |      6 |          6 |
> > > 38283921137336466 |  6013522722816 | ceph-mon.xxx.com | admin:xxx |
> > > sc1                    | 2013-07-13 08:58:27 | NULL                |
> > > NULL        | Up          |                NULL | NULL  |
> > >
> > > The "available_bytes" column is wrong.
> > >
> > > My issue is similar to the one reported by Guangjian Liu here, but
> > > it
> > seems
> > > that so far there's no solutions available?
> > >
> > >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-
> dev/201304.mbox/%3
> >
> CCAKryD0b_QtjhtsFjk8McEQzDH6frOxe6EkJmFrcMDN54e5ZH9A@mail.gmail.
> com%3E
> >
> > It might be a bug on ceph but the thread you referenced was resolved.
> > See here: http://markmail.org/message/mkm2fqyawmwpufsc
> >
> 
> Thanks for the email thread. However, the conversation doesn't mention on
> how was the problem resolved.
> 
> I tried to execute the same command which have suggested by Wido on the
> email thread:
> 
> ===
> root@hv-kvm-02:~# virsh pool-list
> Name                 State      Autostart
> -----------------------------------------
> 87ba6ca3-1b46-3f36-b138-2fd3bffb3d71 active     no
> bab81ce8-d53f-3a7d-b8f6-841702f65c89 active     no
> ff06ae2a-ff27-4ff6-87b3-c2f942cf76d6 active     no
> 
> root@hv-kvm-02:~# virsh pool-info bab81ce8-d53f-3a7d-b8f6-841702f65c89
> Name:           bab81ce8-d53f-3a7d-b8f6-841702f65c89
> UUID:           bab81ce8-d53f-3a7d-b8f6-841702f65c89
> State:          running
> Persistent:     no
> Autostart:      no
> Capacity:       5.47 TiB
> Allocation:     *34819.02 TiB* <-- wrong information
> Available:      5.47 TiB
> ===
> 
> If it still persists, can you please file a bug on JIRA?
> >
> 
> Any specific instructions on how to file the bug?
> 
> 
> >  > Is it safe for me to update the database record manually (using the
> > UPDATE
> > > MySQL command) to reflect the actual usage of the disk?
> >
> > Even if you do whatever is reporting the stats to CS about Ceph's
> > storage usage, will overwrite those values.
> >
> 
> Noted, thanks. So it's an issue on the Ceph RBD side rather than on
> CloudStack side? Updating the Cloudstack database record manually will not
> help?
> 
> In any case, I tried to update the "available_bytes" and "capacity_bytes"
> record on the "storage_pool" table of "cloud" database manually to reflect
> the actual size of the RBD image, which is 3 TB:
> 
> ===
> indra@cs-mgmt-01:~$ rbd --image sc-image -p sc1 info rbd image 'sc-image':
>         size 3072 GB in 786432 objects
>         order 22 (4096 KB objects)
>         block_name_prefix: rb.0.1825.238e1f29
>         format: 1
> 
> mysql> UPDATE storage_pool SET available_bytes=3072000000,
> capacity_bytes=3072000000 WHERE id=209;
> Query OK, 1 row affected (0.03 sec)
> Rows matched: 1  Changed: 1  Warnings: 0 ===
> 
> I tried to re-run the creation of the VM instance again, and it's still 
> failed even
> though the error message is a bit different. Not too sure where the
> "usedBytes" value is coming from?
> 
> usedBytes: 38283921137336466
> 
> ===
> 2013-07-15 12:10:46,232 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-5:job-170) Checking pool 209 for storage, totalSize:
> 3072000000, usedBytes: 38283921137336466, usedPct: 1.246221391189338E7,
> disable threshold: 0.85
> 2013-07-15 12:10:46,232 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-5:job-170) Insufficient space on pool: 209 since its usage
> percentage: 1.246221391189338E7 has crossed the
> pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold: 0.85
> 2013-07-15 12:10:46,232 DEBUG
> [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-5:job-170)
> FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
> 2013-07-15 12:10:46,232 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (Job-Executor-5:job-170) No suitable pools found for volume:
> Vol[231|vm=227|DATADISK] under cluster: 6
> 2013-07-15 12:10:46,233 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (Job-Executor-5:job-170) No suitable pools found
> 2013-07-15 12:10:46,233 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (Job-Executor-5:job-170) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster:
> 6
> 2013-07-15 12:10:46,233 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (Job-Executor-5:job-170) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for
> this VM under any clusters, returning.
> 2013-07-15 12:10:46,235 DEBUG [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-5:job-170) Destroying vm VM[User|Indra-Test-6] as it failed to
> create on Host with Id:null
> 2013-07-15 12:10:46,358 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-5:job-170) VM state transitted from :Stopped to Error with
> event: OperationFailedToErrorvm's original host id: null new host id: null 
> host
> id before state transition: null
> 2013-07-15 12:10:47,052 INFO  [user.vm.DeployVMCmd]
> (Job-Executor-5:job-170)
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM[User|Indra-Test-6]Scope=interface
> com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=6
> 2013-07-15 12:10:47,052 INFO  [user.vm.DeployVMCmd]
> (Job-Executor-5:job-170) Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|Indra-
> Test-6] ===
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > >
> > > Cheers.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Indra Pramana <in...@sg.or.id> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > I am using CloudStack 4.1.0. Just managed to get it setup over the
> > > > weekend. System VMs have been created and both (SSVM and CPVM)
> are
> > running
> > > > fine. The default CentOS template has also been downloaded and
> > > > ready
> > to use.
> > > >
> > > > However, I am not able to launch my first VM instance because the
> > storage
> > > > capacity checker is reporting wrong usage information. I have a
> > > > total
> > of 13
> > > > TB of primary storage and the capacity checker is reporting my
> > > > usage is
> > > > 36,510 TB (274879.22%), which is not supposed to be the case.
> > > >
> > > > ===
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:27:31,632 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl]
> > > > (CapacityChecker:null) System Alert: Low Available Storage in
> > > > cluster
> > > > Cluster-01 pod Pod-01 of availability zone 01
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:27:31,632 DEBUG [cloud.alert.AlertManagerImpl]
> > > > (CapacityChecker:null) Available storage space is low, total:
> > > > 13282342
> > MB,
> > > > used: 36510398411 MB (274879.22%)
> > > > ===
> > > >
> > > > As a result, VM instance creation fails since it's not able to
> > > > find available storage pool.
> > > >
> > > > ===
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,313 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) Checking pool: 208 for volume allocation
> > > > [Vol[227|vm=225|ROOT]], maxSize : 15828044742656,
> totalAllocatedSize :
> > > > 1769538048, askingSize : 8589934592, allocated disable threshold:
> > > > 0.85
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,313 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-3:job-168)
> > > > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: sc-image ,poolId: 209
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,313 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-3:job-168)
> > > > Is localStorageAllocationNeeded? false
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,313 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-3:job-168)
> > > > Is storage pool shared? true
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,317 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) Checking pool 209 for storage, totalSize:
> > > > 6013522722816, usedBytes: 38283921137336466, usedPct:
> > 6366.305226067051,
> > > > disable threshold: 0.85
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,317 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) Insufficient space on pool: 209 since its
> > usage
> > > > percentage: 6366.305226067051 has crossed the
> > > > pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold: 0.85
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,317 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-3:job-168)
> > > > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 1 suitable storage pools
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,317 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) Checking suitable pools for volume (Id, Type):
> > > > (228,DATADISK)
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,317 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) We need to allocate new storagepool for
> > > > this
> > volume
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,319 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) Calling StoragePoolAllocators to find
> > > > suitable pools
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,319 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-3:job-168)
> > > > Looking for pools in dc: 6  pod:6  cluster:6 having tags:[rbd]
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,322 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-3:job-168)
> > > > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator has 1 pools to check for allocation
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,322 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-3:job-168)
> > > > Checking if storage pool is suitable, name: sc-image ,poolId: 209
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,322 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-3:job-168)
> > > > Is localStorageAllocationNeeded? false
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,322 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-3:job-168)
> > > > Is storage pool shared? true
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,326 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) Checking pool 209 for storage, totalSize:
> > > > 6013522722816, usedBytes: 38283921137336466, usedPct:
> > 6366.305226067051,
> > > > disable threshold: 0.85
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,326 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) Insufficient space on pool: 209 since its
> > usage
> > > > percentage: 6366.305226067051 has crossed the
> > > > pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold: 0.85
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,326 DEBUG
> > > > [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator]
> > (Job-Executor-3:job-168)
> > > > FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,326 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) No suitable pools found for volume:
> > > > Vol[228|vm=225|DATADISK] under cluster: 6
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,326 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) No suitable pools found
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,326 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) No suitable storagePools found under this
> > Cluster:
> > > > 6
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,326 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) Could not find suitable Deployment
> > Destination for
> > > > this VM under any clusters, returning.
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,332 DEBUG [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) Destroying vm VM[User|Indra-Test-3] as it
> > failed
> > > > to create on Host with Id:null
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:28,498 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168) VM state transitted from :Stopped to
> > > > Error
> > with
> > > > event: OperationFailedToErrorvm's original host id: null new host id:
> > null
> > > > host id before state transition: null
> > > > 2013-07-15 11:15:29,125 INFO  [user.vm.DeployVMCmd]
> > > > (Job-Executor-3:job-168)
> > > > com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to
> > create a
> > > > deployment for VM[User|Indra-Test-3]Scope=interface
> > > > com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=6
> > > > ===
> > > >
> > > > Anyone can advise on how to resolve this problem?
> > > >
> > > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers.
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Prasanna.,
> >
> > ------------------------
> > Powered by BigRock.com
> >
> >

Reply via email to