http://www.slideshare.net/cloudstack/cloudstack-networking (slides 17 and 18)
On 8/13/13 3:44 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <[email protected]> wrote: >Actually this is not quite true. You can design a network offering with no >NAT or firewall services and give a public range of ips for the network. >Or you (the admin) can utilize the default 'shared network' offering to >create a similar network on a specific VLAN. > > >On 8/13/13 7:03 AM, "Nguyen Anh Tu" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>2013/8/13 Mark van der Meulen <[email protected]> >> >>> Are you saying that the only way CloudStack supports public(read: >>>networks >>> outside immediate pod) access is via NAT? Can I not give the VM's >>>publicly >>> routable IP's(or equivalent for the network)? >> >> >>Hi Mark, >> >>At the moment Cloudstack only supports public access via NAT (staticNat >>or >>sourceNat). For using Route instead of NAT, I made a small patch. You can >>find the reference here: >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Routing+between+Gu >>e >>st+networks >> >> >>-- >> >>N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U >
