http://www.slideshare.net/ShapeBlue/cloud-stack-networking-shapeblue-techni cal-deep-dive
On 8/13/13 10:32 PM, "Mark van der Meulen" <m...@vdm.id.au> wrote: >Does anyone have links to a more comprehensive design or implementation >guide? > >Doco is vague at best, and that slideshow is hardly helpful when it comes >to implementation. > >Mark > >On 14/08/2013, at 10:23 AM, Ahmad Emneina <aemne...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> True, you can have a shared network with public ips, that way vm's get >> public ip's assigned to them directly on launch. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < >> chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >>> http://www.slideshare.net/cloudstack/cloudstack-networking (slides 17 >>>and >>> 18) >>> >>> On 8/13/13 3:44 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Actually this is not quite true. You can design a network offering >>>>with no >>>> NAT or firewall services and give a public range of ips for the >>>>network. >>>> Or you (the admin) can utilize the default 'shared network' offering >>>>to >>>> create a similar network on a specific VLAN. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 8/13/13 7:03 AM, "Nguyen Anh Tu" <ng.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> 2013/8/13 Mark van der Meulen <m...@vdm.id.au> >>>>> >>>>>> Are you saying that the only way CloudStack supports public(read: >>>>>> networks >>>>>> outside immediate pod) access is via NAT? Can I not give the VM's >>>>>> publicly >>>>>> routable IP's(or equivalent for the network)? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Mark, >>>>> >>>>> At the moment Cloudstack only supports public access via NAT >>>>>(staticNat >>>>> or >>>>> sourceNat). For using Route instead of NAT, I made a small patch. >>>>>You can >>>>> find the reference here: >>>>> >>> >>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Routing+between+G >>>u >>>>> e >>>>> st+networks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U >>>> >>> >>> >
