On 16/10/13 7:17 AM, "Bjoern Teipel" <bjoern.tei...@internetbrands.com> wrote:
>Wow, all user@cloudstack mails got catched in my spam filter, so sorry >for the late response. > >After tinkering the whole day I gave up using a tagged VLAN for the >storage traffic, seems not to work. It ignores the VID and doesn't >create the VLAN on the hypervisor. >I added the vlan to the hypervisor now and bound cloudbr1 to it and >using it untagged in cloudstack. >Finally all is up. :-) > >Now I was looking how to use a load balancer like the internal >cloudstack one or even the F5 and it seems it's not supported. >No cloudstack support for internal LB (the VR one) or F5 ? Really !!! >According to the advanced network and security groups specification ( >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Isolation+based+on+ >Security+Groups+in+Advance+zone) >AddF5LoadBalancerCmd api commands will just fail in SG enabled zone. >That's just a joke. 4.1 did not support PF/NAT/LB services in shared network. From 4.2, all network services are supported in shared network with or without SG so you should be able to use F5/VR/Netscaler for LB. > >I'm really close to end the cloudstack adventure and move on with open >stack. >Having a shared network with SG and loadbalancer is not really a >uncommon solution
