I noticed that in Home > Infrastructure > Zones > Zone1, Resources tab, the
Secondary Storage says "Allocated 0.00 KB / 0.00 KB".  However, the
secondary storage NFS mount is listed in Home > Infrastructure > Secondary
Storage and the URL is correct.  Does this mean the secondary storage is
unreachable?


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Ian Young <iyo...@ratespecial.com> wrote:

> I reinstalled my single server CloudStack system yesterday, following the
> quick start guide precisely.  The only difference was that I used
> /var/primary and /var/secondary instead of /primary and /secondary, because
> the /var partition on this machine is very large.  The UI installer reached
> the point where it says "Creating system VMs (this may take a while)" but
> never finished.  I left it overnight and it still hadn't completed.  This
> is typically the step that fails, most of the times I've installed
> CloudStack, so I imagine I must be making the same fundamental mistake each
> time, and I'd like to know what that is.
>
> I checked management.log and it's in a loop where it creates a secondary
> storage VM, fails to start it, destroys it, and tries again.  It says Host
> 1 is unreachable but I'm using the correct password, SELinux is permissive,
> and all the iptables rules are in place.  In what way is it trying to
> connect to Host 1?  SSH?  NFS?  Here's a log excerpt of messages related to
> the SSVM:
>
> http://pastebin.com/X11A51bh
>
> NFS appears to be functional, since CloudStack automatically mounted the
> primary storage.
>
> Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda3              20G  1.8G   17G  10% /
> tmpfs                  32G     0   32G   0% /dev/shm
> /dev/sda1             194M   42M  143M  23% /boot
> /dev/sda4             1.8T  1.9G  1.7T   1% /var
> 192.168.100.6:/var/primary
>                       1.8T  1.9G  1.7T   1%
> /mnt/0594caa2-ceb4-36c6-9b13-0ff149a130af
>
> How can I identify whatever it is that's preventing the SSVM from
> starting?  Here is another log excerpt, without any filtering:
>
> http://pastebin.com/XsPGJQik
>

Reply via email to