Check if agent is running your ssvm. Thanks -min
On 5/28/14 7:26 AM, "Rafael Weingartner" <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi all, >sorry, to bother you again with this thread. >Could at least someone that has the CS 4.3.0 deployed try to download a >volume and/or a template? > >Could someone also check the database, table ³cloud.host² and look if >there >is an entry there for the running SSVM and console proxy VM? > > > >On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner < >rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi folks, I am sending this to the dev list as well, hence I am not sure >> if it is or not a bug. Sorry if I am mistaken. >> >> So, after I upgraded CS from 4.1.1 to 4.3.0, everything seemed to be >> working just fine, however, whenever I try to download a template or >>volume >> I am getting the following error: >> ERROR [o.a.c.s.d.d.CloudStackImageStoreDriverImpl] >> (Job-Executor-1:ctx-1cb86faa ctx-61f7e4f9) No remote endpoint to send >> command, check if host or ssvm is down? >> ERROR [o.a.c.s.d.d.CloudStackImageStoreDriverImpl] >> (Job-Executor-1:ctx-1cb86faa ctx-61f7e4f9) Unable to create a link for >> entity at ... on ssvm,No remote endpoint to send command, check if host >>or >> ssvm is down >> >> I have already destroyed the system VMs in order to let CS recreate them >> with the new system VM template. I logged into the SSVM to check >>whether or >> not it was created using the new template and it indeed. Therefore, I >>have >> ruled out that problem. >> >> Then, I took a look into the source code, more specifically at >> >>"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.driver.CloudStackImageStoreDrive >>rImpl.createEntityExtractUrl(DataStore, >> String, ImageFormat, DataObject)" >> and >> >> >>"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.endpoint.DefaultEndPointSelector.findEndpo >>intForImageStorage(DataStore)". >> >> I noticed that it looks for an entry at table "Cloud.host" that has the >> type ³SecondaryStorageVM². >> >> I took a look into the DB, but, there are no entries either for SSVM or >> Console proxy in ³Cloud.host² table. I mean no entries for the VMs that >>are >> running. The older VMs that were destroyed have an entry there. >> >> Have anyone seem a problem like this before? >> Is there something I am missing? >> >> The VMs are running, should not them be registered there? >> >> -- >> Rafael Weingärtner >> > > > >-- >Rafael Weingärtner