thanks, I checked the "/var/log/cloud/cloud.out", And I found this error:
ERROR AgentShell:607 - Unable to start agent: Resource class not found:
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource due to:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource
Unable to start agent: Resource class not found:
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource due to:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource

It seems that there is a jar dependency missing.



On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Your UI indicates that agent is not running on your SSVM, it should show
> as 'Running', that is why your cloud.host does not have an entry for your
> new SSVM, thus we cannot find a remote host to send command to. Agent is a
> java code running inside your SSVM, you should see what error you
> encountered in starting agent in your ssvm from cloud.out file in SSVM log.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
>
> On 5/28/14 10:20 AM, "Rafael Weingartner" <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >What agent are you talking about?
> >Is it an app that run into the SSVM?
> >I am using xenserver and XCP as the hypervisor.
> >
> >I looked into the CS UI, infrastructure>System VMs and the column that has
> >some values about the agent-state has a -- in it. Is it normal?
> >
> >At the end, should the SSVM have an entry into the host table?
> >
> >
> >On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Check if agent is running your ssvm.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -min
> >>
> >> On 5/28/14 7:26 AM, "Rafael Weingartner" <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi all,
> >> >sorry, to bother you again with this thread.
> >> >Could at least someone that has the CS 4.3.0 deployed try to download a
> >> >volume and/or a template?
> >> >
> >> >Could someone also check the database, table ³cloud.host² and look if
> >> >there
> >> >is an entry there for the running SSVM and console proxy VM?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> >> >rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi folks, I am sending this to the dev list as well, hence I am not
> >>sure
> >> >> if it is or not a bug. Sorry if I am mistaken.
> >> >>
> >> >> So, after I upgraded CS from 4.1.1 to 4.3.0, everything seemed to be
> >> >> working just fine, however, whenever I try to download a template or
> >> >>volume
> >> >> I am getting the following error:
> >> >> ERROR [o.a.c.s.d.d.CloudStackImageStoreDriverImpl]
> >> >> (Job-Executor-1:ctx-1cb86faa ctx-61f7e4f9) No remote endpoint to send
> >> >> command, check if host or ssvm is down?
> >> >> ERROR [o.a.c.s.d.d.CloudStackImageStoreDriverImpl]
> >> >> (Job-Executor-1:ctx-1cb86faa ctx-61f7e4f9) Unable to create a link
> >>for
> >> >> entity at ... on ssvm,No remote endpoint to send command, check if
> >>host
> >> >>or
> >> >> ssvm is down
> >> >>
> >> >> I have already destroyed the system VMs in order to let CS recreate
> >>them
> >> >> with the new system VM template. I logged into the SSVM to check
> >> >>whether or
> >> >> not it was created using the new template and it indeed. Therefore, I
> >> >>have
> >> >> ruled out that problem.
> >> >>
> >> >> Then, I took a look into the source code, more specifically at
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.driver.CloudStackImageStoreDri
> >>>>ve
> >> >>rImpl.createEntityExtractUrl(DataStore,
> >> >> String, ImageFormat, DataObject)"
> >> >> and
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.endpoint.DefaultEndPointSelector.findEnd
> >>>>po
> >> >>intForImageStorage(DataStore)".
> >> >>
> >> >> I noticed that it looks for an entry at table "Cloud.host" that has
> >>the
> >> >> type ³SecondaryStorageVM².
> >> >>
> >> >> I took a look into the DB, but, there are no entries either for SSVM
> >>or
> >> >> Console proxy in ³Cloud.host² table. I mean no entries for the VMs
> >>that
> >> >>are
> >> >> running. The older VMs that were destroyed have an entry there.
> >> >>
> >> >> Have anyone seem a problem like this before?
> >> >> Is there something I am missing?
> >> >>
> >> >> The VMs are running, should not them be registered there?
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Rafael Weingärtner
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Rafael Weingärtner
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Rafael Weingärtner
>
>


-- 
Rafael Weingärtner

Reply via email to