Hi, Before I ran any kind of command I decided to dive a little deeper into this issue. So, I checked the systemvm.iso that is inside CS MS. and it turned out that it has the jars for the CS agent 4.3.0. However, I also checked the systemvm.iso that is in the xen hosts in "/usr/share/xcp/packages/iso/". That .iso also has the jars for the 4.3.0 agent. So, I do not get why my systems VMs have the jar for the 4.1.1 version.
Can somebody explain me the process, like when the jars that are in the systemvm.iso are copied to the system vm? which scripts do that? is there any way to debug that process? I do not understand how the jars from 4.1.1 version are in the Systemvm of 4.3.0 version. On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote: > I don't know the exact cmd line to clear that, and I have always used > XenCenter UI to do that, where clear tags in General tabs. > > Thanks > -min > > On 5/28/14 2:11 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >by clear, you mean "xe vdi-destroy uuid=vdi of systemvm.iso"? > >So, I just need to stop the management servers, run that in every cluster > >that I have and everything should be fine? > > > > > >On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > >> You should clear old systemvm.iso from xen server so that new > >>systemvm.iso > >> built can be deployed there. > >> > >> Thanks > >> -min > >> > >> On 5/28/14 12:42 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >Another interesting fact: > >> >All the jars, cloud-**.jar are label as if they were 4.1.1 version. > >> >Is that right? > >> > > >> > > >> >On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Rafael Weingartner < > >> >rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Just an update. > >> >> I have just checked my console proxy VM, which is also with "--" in > >> >>agent > >> >> state at "insfrastructure>System VM" page. > >> >> The agente is running there, however its state is "--". > >> >> > >> >> I also looked into the source code, and the class " > >> >> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource" > >>is > >> >> located in a jar called "cloud-secondary-storage" which is not in the > >> >> directory "/usr/local/cloud/systemvm" that contains the jars used to > >>run > >> >> the agent. Neither in my SSVM nor in Console proxy VM that jar exist. > >> >> > >> >> I do not get, I cannot be the only one with this problem. It seems > >>that > >> >> this jar is missing into the system vm template. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Rafael Weingartner < > >> >> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> thanks, I checked the "/var/log/cloud/cloud.out", And I found this > >> >>>error: > >> >>> ERROR AgentShell:607 - Unable to start agent: Resource class not > >> >>>found: > >> >>> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource > >>due > >> >>>to: > >> >>> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > >> >>> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource > >> >>> Unable to start agent: Resource class not found: > >> >>> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource > >>due > >> >>>to: > >> >>> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > >> >>> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource > >> >>> > >> >>> It seems that there is a jar dependency missing. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> > >>wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> Your UI indicates that agent is not running on your SSVM, it should > >> >>>>show > >> >>>> as 'Running', that is why your cloud.host does not have an entry > >>for > >> >>>>your > >> >>>> new SSVM, thus we cannot find a remote host to send command to. > >>Agent > >> >>>>is > >> >>>> a > >> >>>> java code running inside your SSVM, you should see what error you > >> >>>> encountered in starting agent in your ssvm from cloud.out file in > >>SSVM > >> >>>> log. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thanks > >> >>>> -min > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On 5/28/14 10:20 AM, "Rafael Weingartner" > >> >>>><rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> >What agent are you talking about? > >> >>>> >Is it an app that run into the SSVM? > >> >>>> >I am using xenserver and XCP as the hypervisor. > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> >I looked into the CS UI, infrastructure>System VMs and the column > >> >>>>that > >> >>>> has > >> >>>> >some values about the agent-state has a -- in it. Is it normal? > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> >At the end, should the SSVM have an entry into the host table? > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> >On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> > >> >>>>wrote: > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> >> Check if agent is running your ssvm. > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> Thanks > >> >>>> >> -min > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> On 5/28/14 7:26 AM, "Rafael Weingartner" > >> >>>><rafaelweingart...@gmail.com > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> >> wrote: > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> >Hi all, > >> >>>> >> >sorry, to bother you again with this thread. > >> >>>> >> >Could at least someone that has the CS 4.3.0 deployed try to > >> >>>> download a > >> >>>> >> >volume and/or a template? > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> >Could someone also check the database, table ³cloud.host² and > >> >>>>look if > >> >>>> >> >there > >> >>>> >> >is an entry there for the running SSVM and console proxy VM? > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> >On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner < > >> >>>> >> >rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> >> Hi folks, I am sending this to the dev list as well, hence I > >>am > >> >>>>not > >> >>>> >>sure > >> >>>> >> >> if it is or not a bug. Sorry if I am mistaken. > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> So, after I upgraded CS from 4.1.1 to 4.3.0, everything > >>seemed > >> >>>>to > >> >>>> be > >> >>>> >> >> working just fine, however, whenever I try to download a > >> >>>>template > >> >>>> or > >> >>>> >> >>volume > >> >>>> >> >> I am getting the following error: > >> >>>> >> >> ERROR [o.a.c.s.d.d.CloudStackImageStoreDriverImpl] > >> >>>> >> >> (Job-Executor-1:ctx-1cb86faa ctx-61f7e4f9) No remote > >>endpoint to > >> >>>> send > >> >>>> >> >> command, check if host or ssvm is down? > >> >>>> >> >> ERROR [o.a.c.s.d.d.CloudStackImageStoreDriverImpl] > >> >>>> >> >> (Job-Executor-1:ctx-1cb86faa ctx-61f7e4f9) Unable to create a > >> >>>>link > >> >>>> >>for > >> >>>> >> >> entity at ... on ssvm,No remote endpoint to send command, > >>check > >> >>>>if > >> >>>> >>host > >> >>>> >> >>or > >> >>>> >> >> ssvm is down > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> I have already destroyed the system VMs in order to let CS > >> >>>>recreate > >> >>>> >>them > >> >>>> >> >> with the new system VM template. I logged into the SSVM to > >>check > >> >>>> >> >>whether or > >> >>>> >> >> not it was created using the new template and it indeed. > >> >>>> Therefore, I > >> >>>> >> >>have > >> >>>> >> >> ruled out that problem. > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> Then, I took a look into the source code, more specifically > >>at > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.driver.CloudStackImageSt > >>>>>>>>>>or > >> >>>>>>>>eDri > >> >>>> >>>>ve > >> >>>> >> >>rImpl.createEntityExtractUrl(DataStore, > >> >>>> >> >> String, ImageFormat, DataObject)" > >> >>>> >> >> and > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.endpoint.DefaultEndPointSelector.f > >>>>>>>>>>in > >> >>>>>>>>dEnd > >> >>>> >>>>po > >> >>>> >> >>intForImageStorage(DataStore)". > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> I noticed that it looks for an entry at table "Cloud.host" > >>that > >> >>>>has > >> >>>> >>the > >> >>>> >> >> type ³SecondaryStorageVM². > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> I took a look into the DB, but, there are no entries either > >>for > >> >>>> SSVM > >> >>>> >>or > >> >>>> >> >> Console proxy in ³Cloud.host² table. I mean no entries for > >>the > >> >>>>VMs > >> >>>> >>that > >> >>>> >> >>are > >> >>>> >> >> running. The older VMs that were destroyed have an entry > >>there. > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> Have anyone seem a problem like this before? > >> >>>> >> >> Is there something I am missing? > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> The VMs are running, should not them be registered there? > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> -- > >> >>>> >> >> Rafael Weingärtner > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> >-- > >> >>>> >> >Rafael Weingärtner > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> >-- > >> >>>> >Rafael Weingärtner > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Rafael Weingärtner > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Rafael Weingärtner > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >-- > >> >Rafael Weingärtner > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >Rafael Weingärtner > > -- Rafael Weingärtner
