Going LXC might be missing the point. I don't think people go Docker because they want containers foremost; they do because hey want an easy way to ship applications and configurations. Going LXC will do nothing for these people.
/imho Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "ilya musayev" <ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 26 January, 2015 18:45:10 > Subject: Re: Docker Support? > Dockers networking model is rather complex (to say the least). > > LXC would be the way to go, though it does not have as much marketing as > docker does. > > Regards > ilya > On 1/26/15 4:51 AM, Osay Osman Yuuni wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Any news on progress with the docker container support for ACS? I've seen >> a few articles on how to install CoreOS on ACS and thence docker as well as >> the wish list for docker containers to be supported in ACS like LXC but I >> was wondering when this'll become a reality. Also seen mentioned elsewhere >> that Exoscale has docker templates? Would be nice if this can go to market >> sooner. >> >> Cheers >> >> Osay
