Hello Daan, Our work is public and published here: https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack
I do not think this is worthwhile, but this is out of my league. I am Ccing Loic here, he will answer better than I can. Regards. Le 13.02.15 12:57, « Daan Hoogland » <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> a écrit : >Antoine, >Did you feed your patches back to the 4.4 branch and should we release >another 4.4 in your opinion? > >On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Antoine Coetsier ><antoine.coets...@exoscale.ch> wrote: >> Hello Daan and users, >> >> We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our >> patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version. >> Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper >> rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in >> smaller versions being shipped in higher ones. >> >> Antoine >> >> >> Le 11.02.15 18:53, « Daan Hoogland » <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >>>H, >>> >>>Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack >>>strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good >>>test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on >>>where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to >>>put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The >>>afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm >>>support. >>> >>>What I am wondering now is: >>>Who else is on 4.4 in production systems? >>>What versions do you run? >>>How did you test it before going to production? >>>What are your migration plans? >>> >>>thanks, >>>-- >>>Daan >> >> > > > >-- >Daan >
