I agree, improved console would be very welcome and would increase the end-user experience as you say.
-thinktwo 2015-05-07 15:54 GMT+02:00 Ronalds D <roni...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > AFAIK they - Proxmox, SolusVM and others are using noVNC HTML5 > implementation, it is pretty fast and works fine. Btw, it is opensource. > Link to the noVNC github: https://github.com/kanaka/noVNC > It could be a nice feature for Cloudstack. > > On 7 May 2015 at 16:48, Alessandro Caviglione <c.alessan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > I'm using CS 4.4.2 and i just want to know if there is a chance to > improve > > the current console. > > I do not want to denigrate the work of developers because I love > CloudStack > > and I think it's very undervalued compared to other competitors ... but > the > > console is really bad. > > Any other product has a better console: Proxmox, SolusVM, Euchalyptus, > etc > > ... > > I know that compared to the entire ecosystem of CloudStack the console > is a > > small piece of the puzzle, but it's the piece that the end user sees > first. > > The console is virtually unusable performing an installation from ISO, > the > > characters are not transferred properly, when you reboot an instance the > > console goes in Access Denied and you have to re-open, while using it > there > > is a continuous flapping of the screen. > > So the user have to open the SSH or RDP ports to the Internet to connect > > directly to his instance and work better ... reducing security and > > increasing the user inconvenience. > > Is there any chance of improvement? > > > > Thank you very much > > >
