Ok. After rebooting the instance still no change after disabling globally. I modified all my templates to remove ‘Dynamic Scalable’, then I have to shutdown every instance and unselect ‘Dynamic Scalable’, then restart for it to be correct.
This may need to be looked at closer for a Windows/XenDesktop(XenApp) environment as MS SQL will consume all the RAM windows sees. My other question is why CCP 4.3 (which is certified for Citrix Ready for IaaS for XD) didn’t have this issue until I upgraded to 4.3.0.2 in July. This feature was released in 4.2….. Thanks for all the help. Todd Pigram http://about.me/ToddPigram <http://about.me/ToddPigram> www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/> @pigram86 on twitter https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 <https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86> Mobile - 216-224-5769 PGP Public Key <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB> > On Sep 4, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Todd Pigram <t...@toddpigram.com> wrote: > > Thanks. > > Just funny that on CCP 4.3 it wasn’t an issue and only after upgrading to > 4.3.0.2 and a host reboot did it change my instances. > > This issue is that the instance below is a SQL server. As Windows see 32GB, > it shows the used RAM in windows as 31.6GB. The Server only has 8GB. That is > what really is the issue. Causing slowness for my users. > > I have set ‘enable.dynamic.scale.vm’ to false and restarted > cloudstack-management. I will reboot an instance that is out of prod and let > you know the results. > > Todd Pigram > http://about.me/ToddPigram <http://about.me/ToddPigram> > www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/> > @pigram86 on twitter > https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 <https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86> > Mobile - 216-224-5769 > > PGP Public Key > <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB> >> On Sep 4, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net >> <mailto:va...@kickcloud.net>> wrote: >> >> Hello Todd, >> >> If I understood you correctly, you wonder why you have static max as 4x >> of the offering, isn't it? This article should answer your question: >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dynamic+scaling+of+CPU+and+RAM#DynamicscalingofCPUandRAM-Xenserver >> >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dynamic+scaling+of+CPU+and+RAM#DynamicscalingofCPUandRAM-Xenserver> >> >> Look chapter for XenServer changes. As it is stated there: static max = >> f_min (4 * service_offering) / memory_overprovisioning_of_cluster >> >> Regards, >> >> Vadim. >> >> >> On 2015-09-04 17:41, Todd Pigram wrote: >> >>> Just wondering if anyone has seen similar. I already have a case open. But >>> seeing if the forum has an answer? >>> Issue, Upgraded to CCP 4.3.0.2 back in July. Afterwards everything was >>> great. Hosts rebooted two weeks ago. Any instance built with a template >>> with Dynamic Scalable set to yes, shows in XenCenter as min/max memory as >>> what system offering is but has a Static Max of 4x the RAM. >>> Screen shot of instance built from template with Dynamic Scalable = yes >>> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/8AoU3kQRQjZccdnUrrAIAXjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink >>> >>> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/8AoU3kQRQjZccdnUrrAIAXjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink> >>> [1] >>> XenCenter of same instance >>> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/IATy1WmgkbdYHtfzpOcqVnjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink >>> >>> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/IATy1WmgkbdYHtfzpOcqVnjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink> >>> [2] >>> In Windows 2012r2 sees Static Max >>> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/AQ_xkMQhmBsJuKALKJ5vBnjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink >>> >>> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/AQ_xkMQhmBsJuKALKJ5vBnjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink> >>> [3] >>> Now if I build a new w2012r2 template without Dynamic Scalable, it works as >>> it should. But I lose the ability to Dynamically scale. >>> Screenshots of instance built form template without Dynamic Scaling and >>> also in XC >>> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3DorqjATJilaUl-B1_7B_3jKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink >>> >>> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3DorqjATJilaUl-B1_7B_3jKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink> >>> [4] >>> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/QSMuaRocZjk8imkHjfuEH3jKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink >>> >>> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/QSMuaRocZjk8imkHjfuEH3jKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink> >>> [5] >>> Anyone aware if this is fixed in CCP/ACS 4.5.1? Has anyone seen this? >>> The XenServer Hosts are patched through XS62ESP1027. >>> Todd Pigram >>> http://about.me/ToddPigram <http://about.me/ToddPigram> [6] >>> www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/> >>> [7] @pigram86 on twitter >>> https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 >>> <https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86> [8] Mobile - 216-224-5769 >>> PGP Public Key [9] >> >> >> >> Links: >> ------ >> [1] >> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/8AoU3kQRQjZccdnUrrAIAXjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink >> >> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/8AoU3kQRQjZccdnUrrAIAXjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink> >> [2] >> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/IATy1WmgkbdYHtfzpOcqVnjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink >> >> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/IATy1WmgkbdYHtfzpOcqVnjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink> >> [3] >> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/AQ_xkMQhmBsJuKALKJ5vBnjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink >> >> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/AQ_xkMQhmBsJuKALKJ5vBnjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink> >> [4] >> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3DorqjATJilaUl-B1_7B_3jKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink >> >> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3DorqjATJilaUl-B1_7B_3jKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink> >> [5] >> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/QSMuaRocZjk8imkHjfuEH3jKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink >> >> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/QSMuaRocZjk8imkHjfuEH3jKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink> >> [6] http://about.me/ToddPigram <http://about.me/ToddPigram> >> [7] http://www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/> >> [8] https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 >> <https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86> >> [9] http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB >> <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB> >
