(rant alert) I have been stating this in the discuss thread and I don't agree with your conclusion; with our new workflow any release is a LTS as long as we maintain the discipline of allowing only bugfixes on the release they first appeared in (or 4.6 as a start point) If we maintain that discipline during review any release henceforth is an LTS. Of course people can pay others to backport outside the Apache CloudStack project if they want, as well. but the notion that we don't have an LTS at the moment hurts. (end of rant)
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Rene Moser <m...@renemoser.net> wrote: > LTS by the community is not an option for now: > > Most of the threads/users/devs had concerns or are skeptical how it can > be done in practice. > > As we recently changed the release process, it seems to "early" to > change it again or add new processes to it. > > I still think CloudStack need some kind of LTS to serve business needs > but unsure if _we_ as community should do it. > > Thanks for participating. > > Regards > René > > > > -- Daan
