Semih, I believe the Usage Server (cloudstack-usage) could be used for this, but it's known to have it's issues. The thing is, if you use regular isolated network, then you can simply make sure inter-VM traffic is done on a separate interface that you can remove from metering. i.e just use different bridges for Public and VM traffic and only meter
For metering in the past I read about Traffic Sentinel https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Usage+metering+for+Direct+Network http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.0.0/root_admin/addTrafficMonitor.html Not sure what is the recommendation nowadays. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Semih Tolga DEMİR" <semihtolgade...@gmail.com> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Friday, 5 February, 2016 07:36:07 > Subject: Re: Adding Ethernet Card > Hi Lucian, > > We are aware that both ip addresses are distributed over separate nics over > hypervisor. > > We need to calculate only internet usage only for public ethernet > interface, for IAAS like usage. > > Is it possible to get/calculate each nics network usage separately over > ACS? > > Thanks. > > 2016-02-04 18:30 GMT+02:00 Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro>: > >> Virtual NICs/networks can be linked to different physical interfaces on >> the hypervisor, if that's what you're asking. >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Semih Tolga DEMİR" <semihtolgade...@gmail.com> >> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> > Sent: Thursday, 4 February, 2016 16:12:37 >> > Subject: Re: Adding Ethernet Card >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Ok,we will give up Security Groups option but if we use NAT + Shared >> > network, Is it possible to evaluate both ethernet usage which taken ACS? >> > and Can we will see ethernet usage separately? >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > 2016-02-04 17:06 GMT+02:00 Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro>: >> > >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> You can't have Security Groups in a pure advanced zone (ie without >> >> security groups). >> >> If you opt for an Advanced zone with Security Groups then you can't have >> >> more than one NIC per VM (sux, I know). >> >> So basically it can't be done. >> >> >> >> The closest you can go for IMHO is in an Advanced Zone to add your VM >> to a >> >> NAT-ed 10.x network (I highly discourage you to use /8) and if you >> really >> >> must have public IPs, then go for a shared network - however security >> >> groups are not available, so you will need to firewall this somehow >> >> yourself. >> >> >> >> HTH >> >> Lucian >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> >> >> Nux! >> >> www.nux.ro >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> > From: "Semih Tolga DEMİR" <semihtolgade...@gmail.com> >> >> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> >> > Sent: Thursday, 4 February, 2016 11:51:48 >> >> > Subject: Adding Ethernet Card >> >> >> >> > Hi; >> >> > >> >> > I need to setup/design an advanced networking with the following >> features >> >> > like below and i like to ask if its possbile or not. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > All vm's have 2 ethernet cards. >> >> > >> >> > 1) This ethernet uses real ip(public) for internet access with >> security >> >> > groups enabled. This ethernets, networks default gateway directly >> points >> >> to >> >> > the gateway at network, it will not pass thru ACS virtual router, we >> do >> >> not >> >> > want to make any NAT or SNAT operation over ACS virtual router. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > 2) This ethernet will use virtual ip like 10.0.0.0/8 for guest >> network >> >> and >> >> > all vm's use this ip for vm interconnect. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > After this setup we like to calculate bandwidth usage only for the >> first >> >> > ethernet card, we do not want to calculate usage for vm interconnect. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks
