Hi Nux, When have you seen the VMs on KVM behaving in the manner which you are expecting? I recall it didn’t work that way in the mid 4.5 versions (we found out the hard way in front of a customer) and it doesn't behave the way you are expecting 4.9 - I've just tested it.
You need host-ha enabled to get reliable HA in the event of a host crash, that is why we developed the host ha feature. Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -----Original Message----- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 23 January 2018 15:06 To: dev <d...@cloudstack.apache.org> Cc: users <users@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Rohit, I'll also have to insist with the VM HA issue. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10246 Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > To: "dev" <d...@cloudstack.apache.org>, "users" > <users@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2018 14:28:34 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > All, > > > Given we've outstanding blockers and PRs in review/testing, I'll cut > RC2 only after we manage to get them reviewed, tested and merged. > > > The outstanding PRs considered for RC2 are: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2418 (Properly parse rules > for security groups) > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2419 (Password server issue) > > > In addition we've following issues to receive fixes: > > - VR - DHCP/dnsmasq leases issue (reported by Ozhan) > > - Dynamic roles upgrade fixes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10249 > > > Please share any other issues you've found, or I've missed. Thanks, > and continue testing RC1. > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > ________________________________ > From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 11:18:27 AM > To: Paul Angus; users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > > The same issue applies to any 4.9, 4.10 release. In case of 4.9, we > had discussed this as a doc bug and so it must be documented part of > the 4.11 release notes as well. > > > There are two ways admin can migrate to dynamic roles post-upgrade: > > > 1. Enable dynamic.apichecker.enabled to true which will use the > default api mapping of rules from 4.8 commands.properties and > automatic annotation based and (db-backed) dynamic rules from 4.9+. > Or, > > 2. The migration script is only useful where admins were not using > the default api rule mappings and they strictly want to check/migrate > each API. This approach requires admins to go through new APIs and > fix commands.properties before running the migration scriopt (we've > been sharing the new/change API list in release notes, for example: > > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.9.3.0/api-changes.html#new-api-commands). > (for reference, doc: > > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/e > n/latest/accounts.html#using-dynamic-roles) > > > Unlike the dynamic API checker, the static checker does not even allow > the root API to access all the APIs which is why post upgrade, if the > UI calls any API that is not allowed for the root admin (in this case > the quotaIsEnabled API) the UI will logout the user on API unauthorized > failure which is what happened. > > > So, we can discuss two fixes: > > - Like dynamic checker, let the static checker allow all APIs only to > the root admin (id=1) (I would not prefer to change the legacy > behaviour though) > > - During upgrade, if commands.properties is missing we set the global > setting to true, i.e. switch to dynamic roles (which would happen if > someone tries to upgrade from 4.5->4.11 using a new mgmt server if > they fail to copy the commands.properties file from /usr/share or /etc paths). > > > Thoughts? > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > ________________________________ > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > > > > From: Paul Angus > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 9:24:25 AM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Rohit Yadav; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Daan Hoogland > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > > If I've understood the issue correctly, "not being able to log in if upgrading > from 4.5" is a blocker in my book. I don't think that it should be the duty > of the Admin, to fix our oversights. Migration to the use of dynamic > roles is also broken as the command will be missing from > commands.properties in the first place, so the 'migrated' commands will not > be complete. > > As there will need to be an RC2, IMO this upgrade issue should be > fixed as part of it. > > > > Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > > VP Technology > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Boris Stoyanov [mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: 22 January 2018 07:31 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>; > d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > > Hi Paul, > Migration script considers only what’s in the command.properties file, > so if the ‘missing’ quotaIsEnabled=15 is not there it will not create > a rule for it. As Rohit mentioned it’s a duty of the admin to take > care of aligning this up. I’m also not big fan of having this > described in release notes, but would like to be included > automatically during upgrade. Main argument against it, its not a blocker. > > Bobby. > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > > > >> On 19 Jan 2018, at 19:04, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote: >> >> OK, just to confirm ‘we’ the community have basically deprecated the >> use of commands.properties? >> >> But for people upgrading from a version before dynamic roles, does >> the migration script take into account (or need to take into account) the >> ‘missing’ >> quotaIsEnabled=15 parameter? >> >> >> >> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue >> >> >> >> From: Rohit Yadav >> Sent: 19 January 2018 09:27 >> To: users <users@cloudstack.apache.org>; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; >> Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) >> >> >> Hi Bobby, >> >> >> >> Agree, it's not user-friendly which is why admins should migrate to >> the dynamic roles feature. But I'm not sure if this is a blocker and >> if an admin wants to stick to the old static (commands.properties) >> way, they need to manage changes themselves. We may add something to >> the release notes /cc @Paul Angus<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>. >> >> >> >> - Rohit >> >> >> >> Software Architect >> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Boris Stoyanov >> <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>> >> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 2:51:32 PM >> To: users >> Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) >> >> Hi Rohit, >> >> That doesn’t sound much user friendly what do you think? Can we look >> for a way to automate this dependency in the upgrade process? >> >> Bobby. >> >> >> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue >> >> >> >>> On 19 Jan 2018, at 10:50, Rohit Yadav >>> <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Bobby, >>> >>> >>> I checked the 4.5-4.11 upgrade environment, due to the nature of how static >>> checker with commands.properties work, admins will be required to add/update >>> new API/ACLs in the commands.properties file. >>> >>> Adding the following to commands.properties file and restarting mgmt server >>> fixes the issue: >>> >>> quotaIsEnabled=15 >>> >>> >>> Please continue testing, thanks. >>> >>> >>> - Rohit >>> >>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Boris Stoyanov >>> <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 6:54:28 PM >>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> >>> Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) >>> >>> I think I’ve hit a blocker when upgrading to 4.11 >>> >>> Here’s the jira id: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10236 >>> >>> I’ve upgraded from 4.5 to 4.11, then I’ve logged in with admin and got >>> session >>> expired immediately. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Boris Stoyanov >>> >>> >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> On 17 Jan 2018, at 8:42, Tutkowski, Mike >>> <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com%3cmailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> For the past couple days, I have been running the KVM managed-storage >>> regression-test suite against RC1. >>> >>> With the exception of one issue (more on this below), all of these tests >>> have >>> passed. >>> >>> Tomorrow I plan to start in on the VMware-related managed-storage tests. >>> >>> Once I’ve completed running those, I expect to move on to the >>> XenServer-related >>> managed-storage tests. >>> >>> I ran these XenServer and VMware tests just prior to RC1 being created, so I >>> suspect all of those tests will come back successful. >>> >>> Now, with regards to the one issue I found on KVM with managed storage: >>> >>> It relates to a new feature whereby you can online migrate the storage of a >>> VM >>> from NFS or Ceph to managed storage. >>> >>> During the code-review process, I made a change per a suggestion and it >>> introduced an issue with this feature. The solution is just a couple lines >>> of >>> code and only impacts this one use case. If you are testing this release >>> candidate and don’t really care about this particular feature, it should >>> not at >>> all impact your ability to test RC1. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Mike >>> >>> On Jan 15, 2018, at 4:33 AM, Rohit Yadav >>> <ro...@apache.org<mailto:ro...@apache.org<mailto:ro...@apache.org%3cmailto:ro...@apache.org>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I've created a 4.11.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for >>> testing and a vote: >>> >>> Git Branch and Commit SH: >>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.0.0-RC20180115T1603 >>> Commit: 1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4 >>> >>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >>> location): >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.0.0/ >>> >>> PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >>> >>> The vote will be open for 72 hours. >>> >>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate >>> "(binding)" with their vote? >>> >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >>> Additional information: >>> >>> For users' convenience, I've built packages from >>> 1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4 and published RC1 repository here: >>> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.11-rc1 >>> >>> The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvmtemplate >>> upgrade section has been updated. You may refer the following for >>> systemvmtemplate upgrade testing: >>> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/latest/index.html >>> >>> 4.11 systemvmtemplates are available from here: >>> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/ >>> >>> Regards, >>> Rohit Yadav
