Jean-Francois,

The issue raised is a valid bug in the new feature but not a blocker so it was 
not included in RC2, the shared bugfix PR will be targeted for 4.11.1.0 release.


- Rohit

<https://cloudstack.apache.org>



________________________________
From: Jean-Francois Nadeau <the.jfnad...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 1:44:36 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: New L2 nework types are not shared

Perfect. Thanks Boris.

Can the fix for shared L2 networks also be merged in 4.11 RC2 ?

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:02 AM, Boris Stoyanov <
boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Thanks Jean-Francois,
> We’ve just confirmed CLOUDSTACK-10239 is a regression and will be included
> in 4.11 RC2. Thanks for bringing this up.
>
> Boris
>
>
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> > On 24 Jan 2018, at 9:57, Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jean-Francois, I don’t know if you’re following dev@ list, there’s
> an open thread for voting on release candidates. If you reply to that
> thread with your findings it’ll be more visible to devs and release
> management.
> >
> > Bobby.
> >
> >
> > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:23, Jean-Francois Nadeau <the.jfnad...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you both Boris and Nux!
> >>
> >> I'll keep an eye 4.11.1.   If I may get your attention on another issue
> >> that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239
> :-)
> >>
> >> best regards,
> >>
> >> Jean-Francois
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov <
> >> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois,
> >>> One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now
> >>> fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a
> >>> project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0
> >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420
> >>>
> >>> Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Boris.
> >>>
> >>> On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we
> are
> >>> doing testing for 4.11.
> >>>
> >>> HTH
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>>
> >>> Nux!
> >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> >>> @shapeblue
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <the.jfnad...@gmail.com>
> >>> To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19
> >>> Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at
> >>> http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/
> >>>
> >>> I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with
> no
> >>> DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required
> to
> >>> fill some CIDR information.
> >>>
> >>> I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the
> previous
> >>> approach when required to integrate an existing network.
> >>>
> >>> If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using
> the L2
> >>> network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I
> can't
> >>> make them public.
> >>>
> >>> ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', <Response [531]>, {u'errorcode':
> 531,
> >>> u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use
> >>> network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission
> >>> denied'})
> >>>
> >>> Provisioning in the root project works just fine....  but really I
> want to
> >>> use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to