On Friday 06 August 2021 at 14:47:03, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Antony Stone schrieb am 06.08.2021 um 14:41
>
> > location pref_A GroupA rule ‑inf: site ne cityA
> > location pref_B GroupB rule ‑inf: site ne cityB
>
> I'm wondering whether the first is equivalentto
> location pref_A GroupA rule inf: site eq cityA
I certainly believe it is.
> In that case I think it's more clear (avoiding double negation).
Fair point :)
Antony.
--
3 logicians walk into a bar. The bartender asks "Do you all want a drink?"
The first logician says "I don't know."
The second logician says "I don't know."
The third logician says "Yes!"
Please reply to the list;
please *don't* CC me.
_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
