On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 3:47 PM Ulrich Windl <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > > >>> Antony Stone <antony.st...@ha.open.source.it> schrieb am 06.08.2021 um > 14:41 in > Nachricht <202108061441.59936.antony.st...@ha.open.source.it>: > ... > > location pref_A GroupA rule ‑inf: site ne cityA > > location pref_B GroupB rule ‑inf: site ne cityB > > I'm wondering whether the first is equivalentto > location pref_A GroupA rule inf: site eq cityA >
No, it is not. The original constraint prohibits running resources anywhere except cityA even if cityA is not available; your version allows it if cityA is not available. _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
