>>> Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> schrieb am 06.08.2021 um 15:14 in Nachricht <caa91j0v2zezd75zay+2qvepdbyaxucrswdgc3opgopkxbhf...@mail.gmail.com>: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 3:47 PM Ulrich Windl > <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: >> >> >>> Antony Stone <antony.st...@ha.open.source.it> schrieb am 06.08.2021 um >> 14:41 in >> Nachricht <202108061441.59936.antony.st...@ha.open.source.it>: >> ... >> > location pref_A GroupA rule ‑inf: site ne cityA >> > location pref_B GroupB rule ‑inf: site ne cityB >> >> I'm wondering whether the first is equivalentto >> location pref_A GroupA rule inf: site eq cityA >> > > No, it is not. The original constraint prohibits running resources > anywhere except cityA even if cityA is not available; your version > allows it if cityA is not available.
?? If a resource must run on "cityA" and cityA is unavailable, then will it run elsewhere? > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
