No problem.  If your data model isn't final yet, you might want to look at the "Data 
Model Resource Book" by Len Silverston.  Extensibility pattern seems to fit very well 
for contact type information.  
 
Chris

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Thomas Nichols [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Wed 4/14/2004 4:06 PM 
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: CRM or Sales Force Automation using Cocoon?
        
        

        Chris,
        
        Thanks for the response, this is a clear summary. For now I need to KISS -
        our last venture into CRM proved a failure because it was over-specified,
        the next will need to be an iterative XP-style effort, climbing the curve
        to take advantage of OFBiz is probably out of scope for now - I think
        Cocoon has pretty much all I need, especially since we need tight IMAP
        integration.
        
        For the future, though, I'll be keeping a close eye on OFBiz - and I agree
        with an earlier post, putting some notes onto the Wiki about benefits of
        OFBiz might help others looking at these two now, and help developers
        interested in tighter integration in the future.
        
        Thanks again,
        Thomas.
        
        
        At 23:44 13/04/2004, Chris Chesney wrote:
        
        >Thomas,
        >
        >Sorry for the delay -- I've been out of pocket for a couple days.  First
        >off, I should give you a better picture of how we've been using OFBiz.
        >We're a consulting company that typically provides custom web
        >applications with a focus on Open Source.  One of our projects required
        >workflow and at the same time, I was working on putting together a list
        >of open source components for enterprise class applications.  Our search
        >for workflow turned up the OFBiz project as they had implemented an XPDL
        >compliant workflow engine.  A closer look at the overall architecture
        >turned out to provide most of what I was looking for in terms of
        >components and design (Service Oriented Architecture, Separation of
        >Concerns, Security, Persistence, Reporting, etc.).
        >
        >We have not really utilized any of the vertical applications.  However,
        >the underlying data model is quite extensive and we've utilized it along
        >with some of the components a few times.  From a data model perspective,
        >it would be plenty flexible to handle a CRM application probably out of
        >the box.  There is a party manager that is fairly mature and I know you
        >can do mailings, but beyond that I don't know what other CRM features
        >have been implemented.  If you're interested, I can certainly look into
        >it further -- it would probably be good for me to know.
        >
        >On the cocoon side, I've always been interested in the project, but have
        >only played with it on occasion.  Based on your email, I can't really
        >see a benefit to using both cocoon and OFBiz.  My lack of experience
        >with cocoon prevents me from giving you a good comparison, so I will
        >tell you the benefits I see in using OFBiz.  You can decide whether they
        >are actually beneficial in your situation.
        >
        >1.  Standard Integrated Data Model
        >2.  Service Oriented Architecture
        >3.  Workflow Engine
        >4.  Security Integrated with Users in Data Model
        >5.  Existing Vertical Applications
        >
        >There is definitely value in keeping it simple.  OFBiz is an enterprise
        >platform and as such has the inherent complexity.  If you're looking to
        >meet your requirements in short order, OFBiz will not work.  If you're
        >looking to provide integrated functionality beyond CRM in the future and
        >your timeframes permit, it might be a good option.
        >
        >Good luck,
        >
        >Chris
        >
        >-----Original Message-----
        >From: Thomas Nichols [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 4:31 PM
        >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >Subject: RE: CRM or Sales Force Automation using Cocoon?
        >
        >Chris,
        >
        >A few people have replied off-list, so I'll reply to the list since
        >there
        >seems to be some interest. From a look around OFBiz it seemed that the
        >CRM
        >modules are not yet very well developed, is that correct? The
        >architecture
        >looks pretty good, and there's certainly some activity there. Compiere
        >again, when I looked at it, seemed strong in other areas - particularly
        >ERP
        >- but not what I was after for a CRM and "groupware" tool. Since I've
        >worked with a number of these CRM beasts, most recently SalesForce and
        >SalesNet, I was considering writing a very basic one that just meets our
        >
        >immediate needs using Cocoon.
        >
        >Jeff Davis' post referred me to Thinlet - which is hugely attractive as
        >a
        >presentation layer. I'm just trying to work out whether Compiere / OFBiz
        >
        >are worth the extra investment on the server side, Cocoon seems to
        >provide
        >most of the architecture I need - auth, hibernate for persistence, flow
        >etc. Given my simple requirements, and heeding Clay Shirky's advice on
        >KISS:
        >http://www.shirky.com/writings/situated_software.html
        >what do you feel would be the major benefits of using OFBiz+Cocoon
        >instead
        >of just Cocoon?
        >
        >We do not need a retail front end - high-value software, every sale
        >involves sales people - though if we did OFBiz would be much more
        >appealing.
        >
        >Thanks for your suggestions thus far.
        >
        >Best Regards,
        >Thomas.
        >
        >At 15:41 09/04/2004, Chris Chesney wrote:
        >
        > >Thomas,
        > >
        > >OFBiz is a java-based platform that implements a service-oriented
        > >architecture and does a pretty good job separating concerns.  To
        > >simplify, it has a persistence layer, a service layer and an MVC layer
        > >for web clients.  A Cocoon app could integrate/utilize OFBiz at various
        > >levels.  How (specifically) were you intending on using Cocoon in this
        > >context?  Feel free to take this offline if you feel it wouldn't be
        > >appropriate for this list.
        > >
        > >Chris
        > >
        > >-----Original Message-----
        > >From: Thomas Nichols [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > >Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 5:17 PM
        > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > >Subject: CRM or Sales Force Automation using Cocoon?
        > >
        > >Hi,
        > >
        > >Is anyone aware of a Sales Force Automation or Customer Relationship
        > >Management system built using Cocoon? Something with the functionality
        > >of
        > >www.salesforce.com or similar would be ideal. There are some intersting
        > >OSS
        > >projects out there for doing CRM, including OFBIZ, Compiere and
        > >Hipergate,
        > >but Cocoon is just so good I want to keep as much as possible of what
        >we
        > >
        > >build using the Cocoon platform. Any suggestions?
        > >
        > >FWIW, other CRM tools can be found in a recent posting at
        > >http://discuss.fogcreek.com/joelonsoftware/default.asp?cmd=show&ixPost=
        >1
        > >25515
        > >
        > >Pointers, anyone?
        > >
        > >Thanks,
        > >Thomas.
        > >
        > >
        > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
        > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > >
        > >
        > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
        > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >
        >
        >---------------------------------------------------------------------
        >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >
        >
        >---------------------------------------------------------------------
        >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        
        
        ---------------------------------------------------------------------
        To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        
        

<<winmail.dat>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to