Derek Hohls wrote: > At least, according to this article: > > http://java.dzone.com/news/death-xslt-web-frameworks > > Maybe some of the developers, or other power users here, > would like to comment at this blog - I see Cocoon also gets > a "dig in the ribs" ... > Without commenting on this specific article, my only general comment is that you'll find articles for specific technologies/projects and you'll find as many articles against these (I guess the most famous topic in our area is Maven). Who's is wrong and who's right? Or more important: is there such an easy answer? I definitly doubt this. There isn't such a thing as the one programming language that rules the world or the one framework that makes everyone happy and is the golden hammer.
Everyone is free to use what he thinks works best for him. Ok, coming back to the original topic :) Looking at the past 9 years where I've been using Cocoon and done a lot of projects with Cocoon and XSLT, I think it was a great tool by the time. And XSLT helped a lot in getting up to speed (once you managed the high entrance barrier to Cocoon itself). There are a lot of use cases still today for XSLT when it comes to create web sites. It really helps to separate the content from the layout. But in the end that's a matter how you design your application. I see a lot of people using other frameworks than Cocoon and pass the output from that framework to XSLT after the framework has rendered the content. So I don't think that XSLT itself is dead. The attraction of Cocoon as a separate framework has decreased, but that's definitly not due to XSLT. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@cocoon.apache.org
