I removed them entirely and it worked ok. Since I'm trying to put together
a bear minimum implementation without optional/distracting code or config
this is useful to know for when I want to put these back in later (as per
Prisca's recommendation).
Thanks all.
beans.xml:
--------------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns:cxf="http://cxf.apache.org/core";
xmlns:jaxws="http://cxf.apache.org/jaxws";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsdhttp://cxf.apache.org/core
http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/core.xsd http://cxf.apache.org/jaxws
http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/jaxws.xsd";>
<jaxws:endpoint id="orderProcessService" implementor="#order_process"
address="/OrderProcess" />
<bean id="order_process" class="demo.order.OrderProcessImpl" />
</beans>
pom:
------
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd";>
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>cxfbook</groupId>
<artifactId>demo.order</artifactId>
<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<packaging>war</packaging>
<name>OrderApp</name>
<properties>
<slf4j.version>1.6.1</slf4j.version>
<logback.version>0.9.29</logback.version>
<cxf.version>2.4.0</cxf.version>
</properties>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId>
<version>${slf4j.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>ch.qos.logback</groupId>
<artifactId>logback-classic</artifactId>
<version>${logback.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
<artifactId>cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws</artifactId>
<version>${cxf.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
<artifactId>cxf-rt-transports-http</artifactId>
<version>${cxf.version}</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</project>
-----Original Message-----
From: Prisca POLYTE
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 10:06 AM
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: cxf.xml
Hi,
In my case this is an extract of my configuration file
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf.xml" />
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf-extension-http.xml" />
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf-extension-jaxws.xml" />
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf-extension-soap.xml" />
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf-extension-xml.xml" />
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf-servlet.xml" />
As far as I know, you do need
cxf.xml, cxf-servlet.xml, cxf-extension-jaxws.xml. These files are
respectively in cxf-core.jar, cxf-rt-transports-http.jar,
cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws.jar.
do you use Maven ? If you do, maven will get some of those jar files by
transitivity. But you should declare those dependencies as you use them ; it
will be clearer.
this is an extract from my pom. I also declare transitive dependencies. my
cxf version is 2.4.1
[extract start]
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
<artifactId>cxf-rt-core</artifactId>
<version>${cxf.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
<artifactId>cxf-api</artifactId>
<version>${cxf.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
<artifactId>cxf-rt-frontend-simple</artifactId>
<version>${cxf.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
<artifactId>cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws</artifactId>
<version>${cxf.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
<artifactId>cxf-rt-transports-http</artifactId>
<version>${cxf.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
<artifactId>cxf-rt-bindings-xml</artifactId>
<version>${cxf.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
<artifactId>cxf-rt-databinding-jaxb</artifactId>
<version>${cxf.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
<artifactId>cxf-common-utilities</artifactId>
<version>${cxf.version}</version>
</dependency>
[extract end]
for the other files I mentioned above see:
http://cxf.apache.org/docs/jax-ws-configuration.html
It seems that you need cxf-extension-soap.xml if you want to use
interceptors.
HTH
regards
--
Prisca
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:21 AM, David G <djg2...@live.co.uk> wrote:
I was using 2.2.3 but changing to 2.4.0 fixed the issue. Which files
shouldn't I need to import?
Still strange though - I left the imports in beans.xml but there still
aren't any physical files anyway, are these being stepped over by CXF and
defaults applied?
-----Original Message----- From: Willem Jiang
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 1:05 AM
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: cxf.xml
Hi,
It looks like you are using CXF servlet transport.
Please make sure you put the cxf-core into the class path.
Which version of CXF are you using ?
If you are using CXF 2.4.x, you don't need to import all the below
resource.
On Wed Aug 10 06:09:44 2011, David G wrote:
I had a jax-ws service working ok then started messing around with
different loggers under the assumption this wouldn’t change core
functionality.
Now I try starting the server and get:
‘class path resource [META-INF/cxf/cxf.xml] cannot be opened because it
does not exist’
My beans.xml file always had the following imports which I thought was
odd
but assumed CXF was creating defaults in the background:
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/**cxf/cxf.xml" />
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/**cxf/cxf-extension-soap.xml" />
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/**cxf/cxf-servlet.xml" />
Does anyone know what could have happened?
Thanks
--
Willem
------------------------------**----
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog:
http://willemjiang.blogspot.**com<http://willemjiang.blogspot.com>(English)
http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: willemjiang
