Maybe you can setup some kind of proxy to delegate the request to a right
service.
In this way CustomerB service will not be accessed by CustomerA.


On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Christian Müller <
christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Sergey, hello Dan!
>
> Thanks for your responses. In the meantime, we changed the service URL's in
> our service which now has a servicePath: http://
> <server>:<port>/servicePath/serviceName
>
> But now we are struggling with another "issue": Imagine you provide a web
> service ServiceA (JAX-WS based on CXF bean definition) for customer
> CustomerA and a service ServiceB for customer CustomerB. If we use the HTTP
> OSGI service, we do not have the possibility to hide ServiceA for CustomerB
> and ServiceB for CustomerA, do we have? We couldn't figure it out how...
> I think we need the possibility to bind a service (CXF bean) to a specific
> port. In this case, we can make sure only CustomerA can access this port
> and only see the services which are designed for him (using client/server
> certificates configured in jetty.xml). We could do than the same for
> CustomerB which should only see ServiceB...
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi Christian
> >
> > Sorry for a delay,
> >
> > On 02/03/12 10:18, cmueller wrote:
> >
> >> We deployed some Camel (2.6.0) routes which provides some JAX WS web
> >> services
> >> via CXF (2.3.3) into ServiceMix (4.3.1). In the present implementation
> we
> >> use "complete" URLs like "http://<server>:<port>/**serviceName".
> >> Everything
> >> works well so far.
> >> Now, we want to benefit from the HTTP OSGI service. After the required
> >> changes, everything still works well in principal. The only change we
> are
> >> try to avoid is the changed service URL. The service in now available
> with
> >> the URL "http://<server>:<port>/cxf/**serviceName". We didn't want to
> >> tell all
> >> our (internal) clients to change the URL. So, we created the file
> >> $SMX_HOME/etc/org.apache.cxf.**osgi.cfg with the following entry:
> >> org.apache.cxf.servlet.**context=/
> >> It didn't work (we received a page from Jetty with all available
> services
> >> if
> >> we request "http://<server>:<port>/**serviceName").
> >> Than we tried:
> >> org.apache.cxf.servlet.**context=
> >> It also didn't work (we received a HTTP 404 response code if we request
> >> "http://<server>:<port>/**serviceName").
> >>
> >> Any other idea to get this working or is this not possible / not
> supported
> >> at the moment / a very bad idea / ...
> >>
> >
> > I was curious myself whether it would work or not so I finally ended up
> > debugging a bit into the pax-web code.
> > For a start I think having a context like "/" set for CXF-enabled
> > endpoints will most likely interfere with other bundles which may offer
> > their own HTTP endpoints, for example, when Karaf starts, a webconsole
> > feature registers a "/system/console" context, so a "/" context would
> catch
> > the requests targeted at the webconsole feature. I temporarily removed  a
> > webconsole from the list of start-up features, but having "/" did not
> > succeed anyway,
> >
> > I was not really pursuing why, most likely it would conflict with the
> > DefaultHttpContext. That could've been explored further but as I said it
> > will most likely be not accepted due to possibility of such a context
> > interfering with the other HTTP-aware bundles. I think it might be a
> minor
> > bug in pax-web that "" and "/" context values are treated differently but
> > the end result is effectively the same.
> >
> > So suppose you have "http://<server>:<port>/**serviceName" and you do
> not
> > want to introduce an extra segment, like "/cxf" (default) or "/services",
> > etc.
> >
> > Then I guess you should set
> "org.apache.cxf.servlet.**context=serviceName"
> > and adjust the jaxws endpoint address attribute to "/". That will work
> but
> > only for a given serviceName value
> >
> > Cheers, Sergey
> >
> >
> >
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >> Christian
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.**
> >>
> com/changing-context-path-in-**OSGI-from-cxf-to-**tp5530551p5530551.html<
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/changing-context-path-in-OSGI-from-cxf-to-tp5530551p5530551.html
> >
> >> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to