Hm, that would be new - are you sure that happens on java11 and how did you start-up the framework?
regards, Karl On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:08 PM Chuck Davis <cjgun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Karl: > > This seems to be the root cause of the other exceptions I'm dealing with. > Obviously, there is no longer a java.net to open. I don't know if the > highlighting will transmit but the problems is: "Caused by:...... > > Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to make protected boolean > java.net.URLStreamHandler.equals(java.net.URL,java.net.URL) accessible: > module java.base does not "opens java.net" to module > org.apache.felix.framework > at org.apache.felix.framework@6.0.2 > /org.apache.felix.framework.URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.<clinit>(URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.java:104) > ... 15 more > Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make > protected boolean > java.net.URLStreamHandler.equals(java.net.URL,java.net.URL) accessible: > module java.base does not "opens java.net" to module > org.apache.felix.framework > at > java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:340) > at > java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:280) > at > java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.checkCanSetAccessible(Method.java:198) > at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.setAccessible(Method.java:192) > at org.apache.felix.framework@6.0.2 > /org.apache.felix.framework.util.SecureAction.setAccesssible(SecureAction.java:871) > at org.apache.felix.framework@6.0.2 > /org.apache.felix.framework.URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.<clinit>(URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.java:79) > ... 15 more > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:53 AM Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The framework itself should work ootb on java11 just fine. Likewise, I > > think the default distribution should work on java11 too (i.e., the > > shell). > > > > Not sure about other bundles - feel free to follow-up with your set-up > > and the exceptions you see. > > > > regards, > > > > Karl > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 1:43 PM Chuck Davis <cjgun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for responding, Rob. I'm very new to OSGi and that sounds like a > > > LOT of tinkering to me (overwhelming in fact at this point !!). > > > > > > But the more I study it the more it makes sense to me and the exceptions > > > I'm seeing. > > > > > > Thanks for your response. > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 8:44 PM Rob Walker <r...@ascert.com> wrote: > > > > > > > We have worked our Felix based app so that it runs on JDK11 - took a > > bit > > > > of tinkering, but there wasn't anything in core code we had to change. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We did need to load the following bundles separately to replace missing > > > > classes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jre-1.8_extra_bundles= > > > > > > > > jre-9_extra_bundles=${j9_replacement_packages} > > > > > > > > jre-10_extra_bundles=${j9_replacement_packages} > > > > > > > > jre-11_extra_bundles=${j9_replacement_packages} > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Karl Pauls > > karlpa...@gmail.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org > > > > -- Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org