Are you maybe trying to add the framework as an automatic module? That wouldn't work, it needs to be on the classpath (i.e., in the unnamed module)...
regards, Karl On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:11 PM Karl Pauls <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hm, that would be new - are you sure that happens on java11 and how > did you start-up the framework? > > regards, > > Karl > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:08 PM Chuck Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Karl: > > > > This seems to be the root cause of the other exceptions I'm dealing with. > > Obviously, there is no longer a java.net to open. I don't know if the > > highlighting will transmit but the problems is: "Caused by:...... > > > > Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to make protected boolean > > java.net.URLStreamHandler.equals(java.net.URL,java.net.URL) accessible: > > module java.base does not "opens java.net" to module > > org.apache.felix.framework > > at [email protected] > > /org.apache.felix.framework.URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.<clinit>(URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.java:104) > > ... 15 more > > Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make > > protected boolean > > java.net.URLStreamHandler.equals(java.net.URL,java.net.URL) accessible: > > module java.base does not "opens java.net" to module > > org.apache.felix.framework > > at > > java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:340) > > at > > java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:280) > > at > > java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.checkCanSetAccessible(Method.java:198) > > at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.setAccessible(Method.java:192) > > at [email protected] > > /org.apache.felix.framework.util.SecureAction.setAccesssible(SecureAction.java:871) > > at [email protected] > > /org.apache.felix.framework.URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.<clinit>(URLHandlersStreamHandlerProxy.java:79) > > ... 15 more > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:53 AM Karl Pauls <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The framework itself should work ootb on java11 just fine. Likewise, I > > > think the default distribution should work on java11 too (i.e., the > > > shell). > > > > > > Not sure about other bundles - feel free to follow-up with your set-up > > > and the exceptions you see. > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Karl > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 1:43 PM Chuck Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks for responding, Rob. I'm very new to OSGi and that sounds like a > > > > LOT of tinkering to me (overwhelming in fact at this point !!). > > > > > > > > But the more I study it the more it makes sense to me and the exceptions > > > > I'm seeing. > > > > > > > > Thanks for your response. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 8:44 PM Rob Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > We have worked our Felix based app so that it runs on JDK11 - took a > > > bit > > > > > of tinkering, but there wasn't anything in core code we had to change. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We did need to load the following bundles separately to replace > > > > > missing > > > > > classes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jre-1.8_extra_bundles= > > > > > > > > > > jre-9_extra_bundles=${j9_replacement_packages} > > > > > > > > > > jre-10_extra_bundles=${j9_replacement_packages} > > > > > > > > > > jre-11_extra_bundles=${j9_replacement_packages} > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Karl Pauls > > > [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > -- > Karl Pauls > [email protected] -- Karl Pauls [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
