+1 on the Flash Player proposal. 2015-07-25 10:42 GMT-04:00 Vincent Sotto <dsreil...@gmail.com>:
> if we want to truly make flash survive, we push adobe to donate the flash > player > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Udirley Otoni Pesse < > udirleyot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I agree with you also work with flex a few years and I am very saddened > by > > the attacks that technology has been suffering from all sides, now I will > > try not need browser converting everything to AIR. I have several tools > > developed and continue to be a developer happy flex. > > > > 2015-07-17 21:18 GMT-03:00 <f...@dfguy.us>: > > > > > Well there are a lot of desktops and laptops out there and windows > > tablets > > > should become more widespread since they are the full OS and not > slimmed > > > down mobile OS. That means that Flash is and will be available for > good. > > A > > > lot of these articles seem to be another last push by tech writers and > > > others who have always seemed to go after Flash, especially after Steve > > > Jobs popularized it in 2010. I've never had any security or performance > > > issues with Flash and I've been having fun developing with it since > > Flash 4. > > > > > > Most of this is just anecdotal and people always like to have some > issue > > > to talk up and feel smart about. What I don't like is that there are so > > > many great people who have worked hard on this software over the years > > and > > > they deserve better. Most commentators probably harp on Flash simply > > > because it can do almost everything and they are probably sick of > always > > > having to talk about it. It's installed on 98% of computers after all > > like > > > they say. > > > > > > The mobile Flash player was always a little difficult to design to > anyway > > > because of the small screen sizes, with html too. So using AIR for > mobile > > > is a good option regardless. Otherwise, it's been clear that Flash has > > been > > > ahead in almost every way it's entire life so a lot of the commentary > is > > > from companies that want to promote their own software and are happy to > > > attack a competitive platform if there's a security update or something > > > else; app stores, browser vendors, JavaScript framework creators, video > > > graphics software, animation tools, gaming platforms, etc. > > > > > > David > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: douglowder <dlow...@tpocc.org> > > > To: users@flex.apache.org > > > Sent: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 6:22 PM > > > Subject: Re: Flex/Flash Viable still? > > > > > > Oh my, that is brilliant. I eagerly await the writing of "Thoughts on > > > HTML5." What goes around comes around. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Flash-Viable-still-tp10760p10792.html > > > Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > UDIRLEY OTONI PESSE > > Celular: (27) 9316-4909 > > E-mail 1: udirleyot...@gmail.com > > E-mail 2: udirleyot...@hotmail.com > > Msn: udirleyot...@hotmail.com > > >
