Sounds like you made two major changes. Did you do them separately and measure the effects of each change? In theory, cutting out half the loops should have cut the time in half and I thought you were already under 3 minutes. You might want to make sure the sparse array doesn't have some unintended side effect.
-Alex On 8/4/16, 5:42 PM, "bilbosax" <waspenc...@comcast.net> wrote: >WooHoo! 1 minute and 45 seconds! I can live with that. Taking out half >of >the calculations and storing the data in a sparse array, and then looping >the sparse array knocked off another 20-30 seconds! Thanks for all of the >help guys, I am glad this community is here and I have learned a lot from >all of you! > >...now, I am going to have to read up about hashing :) > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Workers-and-Speed-tp13098p1 >3225.html >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
