Agree with Alex :) You should be under the minute barrier, since you're doing just half the job (unless of course getting the results from the DB takes 1 minute :)
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Sounds like you made two major changes. Did you do them separately and > measure the effects of each change? In theory, cutting out half the loops > should have cut the time in half and I thought you were already under 3 > minutes. You might want to make sure the sparse array doesn't have some > unintended side effect. > > -Alex > > On 8/4/16, 5:42 PM, "bilbosax" <waspenc...@comcast.net> wrote: > > >WooHoo! 1 minute and 45 seconds! I can live with that. Taking out half > >of > >the calculations and storing the data in a sparse array, and then looping > >the sparse array knocked off another 20-30 seconds! Thanks for all of the > >help guys, I am glad this community is here and I have learned a lot from > >all of you! > > > >...now, I am going to have to read up about hashing :) > > > > > > > >-- > >View this message in context: > >http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Workers- > and-Speed-tp13098p1 > >3225.html > >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
