I like this question. We must get this right, guys. As a marketing guy, turned developer (sort of), it's critical to rightly position FlexJS in front of the competition and the (unfortunate) legacy of flash.
To be frank, I have not used FlexJS so far, but I'm a convinced believer in its potential. So here are some keywords I can think of: "Robust" "Flexible" "Open" "Dynamic community" "Committed community" "The right way" "Embraces modern platforms" "HTML" "Powerful" "Built on technology that empowered the web several years back - empowered by the community to drive the future" my humble 2cents... Berty Tonta ____________________________________________________________________________ LEADSTALK - 4 BENGALI STREET, BEAU BASSIN, MAURITIUS TEL +230 57 43 81 34 - berty.to...@leadstalk.pro - LEADSTALK.PRO On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Erik on dev [1] list came up wit interesting question. I'm posting it also > here: > > > With the upcoming fork and renewed focus and most likely some publicity, I > want to ask the community to answer this question: > > Why should a web dev choose FlexJS to write JS applications, and not go > with a more mainstream option like e.g. TypeScript/Angular? > > I think that if we can answer that question in a compelling way, we are in > a good place as a project (from a code perspective, at least) and it gives > the marketing folks something to work with. > > > [1] > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FLEXJS-Marketing-why- > should-a-web-dev-choose-FlexJS-td64292.html > > Thanks, > Piotr >
