On 02/26/2011 04:56 PM, Tom Davies wrote: > >>** Reply to message from Vic Dura ... > >> Thanks Cliff. Has anyone here run into a problem installing LO 3.3.1 >> over OO 3.3.0 on a Windows system? If so, would you care to mention >> what the problem/solution was? ... Note: Tom fix (or change) your email client. Your posts do not show proper attributions or quote indicators. You've already been advised on how to do this.
> > There are sometimes other problems but it's fairly rare. The easiest answer > is > to uninstall OpenOffice since it is easy to reinstall if you ever want to > return. It is *not* rare. In fact it is common. Please see: <http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/4130> and particularly: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/4137> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/4359> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/4360> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/4360> That is why there is a release note regarding this issue: http://www.libreoffice.org/download/release-notes/ I suggest that you've not actually installed and tested OOo and LO on a Windows system. If you have (installed) you certainly haven't paid any attention to application icons, defaults, associations et al. Please do not continue to advise that OOo and LO easily coexist together on a Windows system, particularly when the release notes advise against doing so for the very reasons I've pointed out above. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
