It is of my opinion that you should stick with the standards. What is wrong with calling the newest possible stable version "Release Candidate", the proven stable version "Stable", the unstable beta-tester version "Beta"?
It makes absolutely no sense to me to be different just for the sake of being different. Is not Libre Office already different? Yes, it is a fork from OpenOffice.org, but you are still different. Stick with the standards. This "fresh" and "still" horse hoowhee is just that, a big pile of horse hoowhee. As NoOp said, most of you open source developers already make the download page confusing enough without confusing it even further with the horse hoowhee. Just stick with what almost everyone already knows. Quit trying to be new and gritty. It just shows me your stupidity instead of your intelligence. rmfr -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Still-tp4117297p4117877.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
