Thank you;
and for some good examples.
BTW -
here's 'compatibility' as defined by the Oxford Dictionary, which
I think is recognized as an authority worldwide ;-)
[1a state in which two things are able to exist or occur together without
problems or conflict
1.1a feeling of sympathy and friendship; like-mindedness
1.2 Computing: The ability of one computer, piece of software, etc., to
work with another]
To me, fully compatible vs. compatible could parallel identical
twins vs. fraternal twins or clarified butter vs. butter or suede vs.
brushed leather or wood vs. wooden veneer or ... ... ... ;-)
And I guess I'm a detailist - perfectionist if you would; I gave up
photography when B&W film became impossible to obtain -
to me, in composing a photograph I consider all the components
yet with color photography - and now with digital images - the detailing is
impossible to obtain as it was when dealing with silver.
From: toki <toki.kant...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Question about LO Writer and "complex
documents"
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
On 07/24/2015 09:08 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> This is simply a false statement. "It's not compatible."
That literally depends upon how "compatibility" is defined.
There are use-cases where MSO 2013 is completely, utterly, and
absolutely incompatible with MSO 2013, when installed on a different
computer.
There are use-cases when MSO 2013 and OOo 1.x are completely compatible
with each other.
Jonathon
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
