On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Chris Smith <ch...@distributedbio.com> wrote: > While I would love to see LSF open sourced, I don't have quite the > faith you have, Rayson.
Hi Chris, Haven't worked with you for a long time... (10+ years?) > IBM also has a lot of software that they don't > open source (LL being one!). I agree. Tivoli, which I have experience with, is not open source. (And the list goes on: Websphere, DB2, AIX, JIT/compilers, z/OS, IBM i, etc) By open, I hope "IBM LSF" would at least release the documentation for download. More importantly, IBM sales have better integrity, and they don't commonly use sneaky FUD-based sales tactics. > I'm the one who mentioned openlava to > Chris, by the way. For the folks I deal with, it's got enough > functionality and horsepower to get the job done. And I'm motivated to > create some momentum around it so that it continues to improve. Yup, given your experience with LSF, I guess you and other LSF experts would find OpenLava easier to migrate to. Rayson > > -- Chris > _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@gridengine.org https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
