On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM, John Almberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I run a web server with a bunch of websites, all of which need an SSL > connection. Instead of buying a big block of new IP addresses, I'm > thinking of running the SSL virtual hosts on non-standard ports, like > 444, 445, etc. (just an example... I'd probably use a higher set of > numbers.)
> Why don't you see more SSL addresses like this? Why shouldn't I do this? I'm not really an expert in this, but I'd say the reasons are: 1. Corporate firewall rules that block everything but 80 and 443. 2. Some users (smart ones) will take a careful look at the browser's location bar before trusting an SSL site. Seeing a non-standard port may give them doubts. (For example, perhaps a hacker broke into the server and setup a site to steal info on a high-numbered port.) I don't have any data to say whether these are serious problems or not. Technically, your solution will work fine. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
