Technically, it all work fine. I think Joshua put his finger on the
fatal flaw -- corporate firewalls that block access to 'suspicious'
ports. Not a problem for most home users, but a serious problem for
people working behind paranoid/appropriately concerned corporate
firewalls...
Oh well. It sounded like a good idea! Luckily IP addresses are still
cheap and available. Guess I'll grab another block of 64.
Thanks: John
On Mar 27, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Wilda, Jet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the bigger issue is that you certificate will be for 1
FQDN i.e.
sample.com and hitting with any other FQDN will pop up a window
saying
the certificate and servername don't match.
No, he can supply a different certificate for each port. Port-based
and IP-based virtual hosting are almost-identical from an application
perspective. It is name-based virtual hosting that causes problems.
Joshua.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Websites for On-line Collectible Dealers
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Identry, LLC
John Almberg
(631) 546-5079
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.identry.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
