On Sun,13 Apr 2008 23:00:19 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Daniel Aleksandersen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > Why does type-maps rely on multiviews to be enabled? I can sort of > > understand why it is required to match [../resource] with > > [../resource.var]. BUT as type maps are presented as an alternate to > > multiviews in the documentation; I find it strange that it still requires > > multiviews to work. > > > > They are not required. > > You can either use resource.var directly in your links (in other > words, expose that URL as your public address for the resource) or > change the name of your type-map file to just "resource" and use > SetHandler to mark it as a type-map.
Any file without an extension is treated as a type-map. I presume that .htaccess is excluded by design? <FilesMatch "!.*\..*\$"> SetHandler type-map </FilesMatch> Another question, can I partaly negotiate between various type-maps? Say I have one type-map called [../resource] saying: URI: resource,en Content-Language: en And then [../resource,en] saying: URI: resource,en,utf-8.htm Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8; qs=0.8 URI: resource,en,utf-8.xht Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml; charset=UTF-8; qs=1.0 Or would I have to spesify everything two times? -- Daniel Aleksandersen --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
