On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 07:28 +0100, André Warnier wrote: > Krist van Besien wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:01 PM, André Warnier <a...@ice-sa.com> wrote: > >> The other way I could think of would be to use virtual hosts, like > >> > >> Listen 80 HTTP > >> Listen 443 HTTPS > >> > >> NameVirtualHost *:80 > >> <VirtualHost *:80> > >> ... > >> </VirtualHost> > >> > >> NameVirtualHost *:443 > >> <VirtualHost *:443> > >> ... (SSL-based config) > >> </VirtualHost> > > > > You don't need the NameVirtualHost directives. > > Uh ? > "If name-based vhosts should be used a NameVirtualHost directive /must/ > appear with the IP address set to be used for the name-based vhosts. In > other words, you must specify the IP address that holds the hostname > aliases (CNAMEs) for your name-based vhosts via a NameVirtualHost > directive in your configuration file." > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/details.html > >
But if you only have two vhosts, and each of them on a different port, then you would not need them to be name based vhosts, and that entire paragraph is moot :) Without the NameVirtualHost directives, it is just a simple IP based virtual host. Cheers Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
