I have finally found it! fcgid and apache work great (as usual :P), the problem rests elsewhere:
When I hit the static file my browser downloads favicon.ico as well. If it doesn't exist, server raises E404 - and that is handled by PHP in configurations with mod_rewrite clean url hack. robots.txt does similar problems with web crawlers. I'm going to solve it by writing a redirect that will return E504. (E404 would be caught by ErrorDocument, which would lead to same problems.) Another step to make my server really effective. :) Thanks for your help, I wouldn't have figured it out as soon without it :). On 30.10.2010 12:27, Honza Lefty Škoda wrote:: > On 29.10.2010 19:08, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> 2010/10/28 Honza Lefty Škoda <le...@multihost.cz>: >>> Hi! >>> >>> I use mod_fcgid & suexec for safe execution of php scripts. I've >>> recently tested the performance of fcgid >>> and found out that when i request static page (.html or .css) >>> fcgi process is spawned (if doesn't exist yet) >> >> unexpected >> >>> and the >>> counter "Accesses" on server-status page increments as well. >> >> expected > Are you sure? I've probably described it wrong way, I meant Accesses > counter of the corresponding fcgid worker (mod_fcgid status section) >> >>> >>> I'm not sure if this is a bug, result of my wrong settings, or >>> desired behavior, but it imho leads to quite poor performance. >>> I use mpm_worker, gentoo linux, mod_fcgid 2.3.5, apache 2.2.15. >>> >>> Pieces of configuration I found relevant: >>> >>> In file: /etc/apache2/modules.d/20_mod_fcgid.conf >> >>> Options +ExecCGI >>> AddHandler the-php .php >>> Action the-php /mh-bin/php-wrapper.fcgi >> >> something more is needed to run static files through php; the other >> directives are irrelevant >> >> (it is getting processed by php, right? mod_fcgid can't handle static >> file requests itself) > > If I insert PHP code into the static file (like <?php echo "something"; > ?>), it isn't processed, so it probably doesn't go through PHP > interpreter. Maybe it doesn't go through fcgi worker at all. On the > other hand, the speed of processing static files is imho quite poor > (static file is servered 3x faster than PHP with DB). > > The mail reason why I began inspecting this problem is that static files > "wakes" fcgi threads and prevents idle timeouts, spawns new threads and > so. I would expect fcgid not serving static files (and ignoring them in > fcgi process management!) at all. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
