On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't understand why this question got no responses . > > Surely it is not an unreasonable request to ask the server to support > SSI requests like : > \<\!\-\-\#include virtual\=\"include/head.html\"\-\-\> > without also exporting "include/*" to be available to HTTP/S requests ? > > Of what meaning to users could a "head.html" or "footer.html" fragment be > expected to be ?
Virtual treats it like a normal request for that URL, so I would expect it to be an otherwise valid URL for a client. "file" is an alternative. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
