What is the configuration in both cases? php-fpm pool included. How did you measure?
El lun., 11 ene. 2016 a las 22:52, Rose, John B (<jbr...@utk.edu>) escribió: > After switching to mod_php from php-fpm we are told the site is working 4x > faster using mod_php instead of php-fpm. > > Any explanation? > > Thanks > > From: William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > Reply-To: "users@httpd.apache.org" <users@httpd.apache.org> > Date: Saturday, January 9, 2016 1:58 PM > To: "users@httpd.apache.org" <users@httpd.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Circumstances when mod_php would run faster > than PHP-FPM? > > Mod_proxy_fcgi + php-fpm or mod_fcgid with php fcgi sapi should both be > equivalent when tuned correctly. > > Your only option for running php in process efficiently is to use the > non-threadsafe php in the httpd preform module. Your only option for > running httpd efficiently is the event, or at least the worker mpm. > > Since usually only a subset of the http requests are to a php resource, > the answer is almost always 'no'. > On Jan 8, 2016 16:48, "Rose, John B" <jbr...@utk.edu> wrote: > >> Apache 2.4 >> >> On the same system, same web site, are there circumstances when Apache >> using mod_php would run faster than Apache using PHP-FPM? >> >> Thanks >> >
