Is the firewall blocking? Or from what you said the ping v6 would have to be encaped via proto 41 by the router or clients to eth0 if on the side of the cable as NAT is there I think? /jim
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Michael Banta > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 5:46 PM > To: Brian Zill > Cc: users@ipv6.org > Subject: Re: 2002 addresses > > Things are even clearer now.... > > But. > > I am running radvd on the firewall, and I have it advertising > a /48 to > my internal machines. radvd avertises on eth1, which is the > lan side of > the router. The winxp and linux clients on the inside both pick up > addresses from the advertising router. I can ping from the > clients to > eth1 on the router, but not to eth0 (outside interface). > Obviously, I can't ping to the internet either. > > I am guessing a routing issue maybe. > > Thanks > Mike > > > > wrote: > > >Yes, you can't use 6to4 with private addresses (at least to > talk to the > >rest of the Internet). 6to4 won't work to a router behind a > NAT. For > >the particular case of Windows XP, the IPv6 stack won't even > attempt to > >create a 6to4 address from a private address. > > > >You shouldn't need to tunnel inside your own network if it's just a > >single subnet. You should be able to run IPv6 natively. To do this, > >set up your gateway router (the machine with your end of the > tunnel to > >your IPv6 ISP) to advertise a subnet of the prefix you get from your > >IPv6 ISP on your internal network, and to route IPv6 packets back and > >forth between your subnet and the tunnel. Any client boxes on your > >subnet should automatically configure addresses based on router > >advertisements they receive from your gateway router. > > > >--Brian > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > >>Behalf Of Michael Banta > >>Sent: Thursday, 17 March, 2005 09:49 > >>To: users@ipv6.org > >>Subject: 2002 addresses > >> > >>Ok, things are starting to make a little more sense, thank you all. > >> > >>I was ready to assign an IP of 2002: to a windows xp client > >>when I realized that this machine is behind a firewall and > >>has a nat'ed address of 10.0.10.x. I would not think that > >>would be allowed. > >> > >>Is this a correct assumption? > >> > >>Thanks > >>Mike > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > >>The IPv6 Users Mailing List > >>Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The IPv6 Users Mailing List > Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The IPv6 Users Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
