On Monday, March 17, 2014 06:17:10 PM Adam Retter wrote: > We did try using the: > > "yourSPARQLEndpoint elda:supportsNestedSelects true." > > Although I think we found that the option was actually (non-plural): > > "yourSPARQLEndpoint elda:supportsNestedSelect true."
Oops, sorry. > However, whilst Elda reported that it did indeed support the > NestedSelect, it continued to create that absolutely massive union for > our query. > > The good news is my colleague Rob was able to change Elda's config > file so that it generated a much simpler query for us. So we have now > moved past that one. If anyone wants more info on this, please say, > and I will ask him to post some detail. I think this is a problem with views that ask for labels on the viewed items (ie based on the view called "all", referenced with "api:labelledDescribeViewer"). The code that requests the object labels doesn't have a fallback if there are lotsandlots of selected items. If the fix Rob made was to change from labelledDescribeViewer to a simpler viewer like api:describerViewer then that's a confirmation and I'll add an issue to the issues list. Chris -- "A facility for quotation covers the absence of original thought."/Gaudy Night/ Epimorphics Ltd, http://www.epimorphics.com Registered address: Court Lodge, 105 High Street, Portishead, Bristol BS20 6PT Epimorphics Ltd. is a limited company registered in England (number 7016688)
