Re: More JSON-LD question

[Andy Seaborne]

On 12/01/17 03:35, Conal Tuohy wrote:
On 12 January 2017 at 12:34, Grahame Grieve <
grah...@healthintersections.com.au> wrote:

Consider this JSON-LD:
{
  "@type": "fhir:Claim",
  "@id": "http://hl7.org/fhir/Claim/760152";,
  "Quantity.value": {
     "decimal": 123.45
  }
  "@context": {
    "fhir": "http://hl7.org/fhir/";,
    "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#";,
    "decimal": {
      "@id": "fhir:value",
      "@type": "xsd:decimal"
    }
    "Quantity.value": {
      "@id": "http://hl7.org/fhir/Quantity.value";
    }
  }
}

This is valid,


No, it's not valid. Paste it into http://json-ld.org/playground/ and see


but Jena logs an error: WARNING: Lexical form '1.2345E2' not
valid for datatype http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#decimal

I think this is a bug in Jena - or JsonLD-java?


Maybe there is a bug there, maybe not, but you need to get your JSON-LD
correct first.

Agreed.

Also, in JSON, a bare number is a long or double, not decimal, so try 
putting in the lexical form in a string:

>>   "Quantity.value": {
>>      "decimal": 123.45

  "decimal": "123.45"

http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#dfn-number
[[
a number is equivalent to either a long or double, depending on if the 
number has a non-zero fractional part
]]

        Andy