I use "urn:ex:..." in a lot of my test code (short for "urn:example:").
Then the predicate is "urn:ex:time/now" or "urn:ex:time/duration" or whatever you need... On 12 April 2017 at 09:49, Laura Morales <laure...@mail.com> wrote: > > The question is a bit unclear. If there is no existing vocabulary that > > you can resp. want to reuse, then you have to use your own vocabulary > > which basically just means to use your own URIs for the predicates. > > Right, so let's say I don't want to define any new vocabulary, but I just > want to use some predicates. For example a predicate called "predicate1" > and "predicate2". These are not meant to be shared, I use them for whatever > reason and I take full responsibility to shooting myself in the foot. Is > there any "catch-all" or "default/undefined" vocabulary that I can use? I > mean something like a default vocabulary that parses as valid URIs, but > whose meaning is undefined (= the interpretation is left to the user)? > Something like "<subject> <undefined:predicate1> <object>" and "<subject> > <undefined:predicate2> <object>"... I wonder if I should use "<subject> > <_:predicate1> <object>" but I'm not sure?! >
