Hi Andy,
Have you had a chance to look at the difference between the overloaded
"validate" methods of "ShaclValidator", in terms of qualified value shapes.
Apologies if I bothered you with this.
Yasir
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org>
Sent: 27 January 2022 08:40
To: users@jena.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Validation issue
On 26/01/2022 22:49, Alani, Yasir wrote:
> *The node to be validated is "yas:Car_1"
>
> Thanks again
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alani, Yasir <y.al...@tees.ac.uk>
> Sent: 26 January 2022 22:38
> To: users@jena.apache.org
> Subject: RE: FW: Validation issue
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> Thank you for responding.
>
> What I meant by "work" is producing the correct/expected result, which is the
> 2 violations you received. The issue only seems to happen when I try to
> validate a node using the method "validate(Shapes shapes, Graph data, Node
> node)". The node in this case is "aso:Car_1". This method doesn't seem to
> 'like' qualified value shapes, as it returns 0 violations.
I get one violation when calling:
shacl v -data data.ttl -shapes shapes.ttl \
-target
'https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.semanticweb.org%2Fyas%23Wheel_1&data=04%7C01%7CY.Alani%40tees.ac.uk%7Ce6691c8465804ae8f02708d9e170a7e8%7C43d2115ba55e46b69df7b03388ecfc60%7C0%7C0%7C637788696243499932%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=TY3YRMvJpeBcPAMkQKbtRMIUCAK%2BOE24Cr%2BPezQ9Ziw%3D&reserved=0'
There are two target nodes. yas:Wheel_1 and yas:Car_1
"Per node" is "find which shapes have the node as a target node and call that
shape".
If the specified node isn't in the targets of the data+shapes, you get zero
violations.
Andy
>
> However, when I validate the entire data graph using method "validate(Shapes
> shapes, Graph data)" I do get 2 violations. Are these methods designed to
> work this way?
>
> I was using Jena 4.1.0 and even when I updated to Jena 4.3.2, I still get the
> same results.
>
> I used the old (TQ) shacl playground, which returned 2 violations as well.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Yasir
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org>
> Sent: 26 January 2022 20:41
> To: users@jena.apache.org
> Subject: Re: FW: Validation issue
>
> Yasir,
>
> What is "work" here?
>
> I get 2 violations with Jena 4.3.2 - the same as (current latest) TQ
> shacl. (1 violation on a quite old, pre 4.x.x version of Jena - which
> version are you running?)
>
> Which SHACL playground did you use (there are two).
>
> The old (TopQuadrant) SHACL playground returns 2 violations.
> The Zazuko one returns 2 violations.
>
> [ rdf:type sh:ValidationReport ;
> sh:conforms false ;
> sh:result [
> rdf:type sh:ValidationResult ;
> sh:focusNode yas:Wheel_1 ;
> sh:resultMessage
> "Data value \"600\"^^xsd:float is not less than or equal to 200" ;
> sh:resultPath ( yas:hasDiameter yas:hasValue ) ;
> sh:resultSeverity sh:Violation ;
> sh:sourceConstraintComponent sh:MaxInclusiveConstraintComponent ;
> sh:sourceShape [] ;
> sh:value "600"^^xsd:float
> ] ;
> sh:result [
> rdf:type sh:ValidationResult ;
> sh:focusNode yas:Car_1 ;
> sh:resultMessage
> "QualifiedValueShape[1,_,false]: Min = 1 but got 0 validations" ;
> sh:resultPath yas:hasComponent ;
> sh:resultSeverity sh:Violation ;
> sh:sourceConstraintComponent
> sh:QualifiedMinCountConstraintComponent ;
> sh:sourceShape []
> ]
> ] .
>
> Andy
>
