Raja,
   Which Kafka version is your security enhancement based on?

thanks,
Cal


On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Chris Neal <cwn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Pramod,
>
> I got that same error when following the configuration from Raja's
> presentation earlier in this thread.  If you'll notice the usage for the
> console_producer.sh, it is slightly different, which is also slightly
> different than the scala code for the ConsoleProducer. :)
>
> When I changed this:
>
> bin/kafka-console-producer.sh --broker-list n5:9092:true --topic test
>
> to this:
>
> bin/kafka-console-producer.sh --broker-list n5:9092 --secure
> --client.security.file config/client.security.properties --topic test
>
> I was able to push messages to the topic, although I got a WARN about the
> property "topic" not being valid, even though it is required.
>
> Also, the Producer reported this warning to me:
>
> [2014-07-23 20:45:24,509] WARN Attempt to reinitialize auth context
> (kafka.network.security.SecureAuth$)
>
> and the broker gave me this:
> [2014-07-23 20:45:24,114] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> n5.example.com/192.168.1.144:48817//192.168.1.144:9092
> (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> [2014-07-23 20:45:24,374] INFO finished ssl handshake for
> n5.example.com/192.168.1.144:48817//192.168.1.144:9092
> (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> [2014-07-23 20:45:24,493] INFO Closing socket connection to
> n5.example.com/192.168.1.144. (kafka.network.Processor)
> [2014-07-23 20:45:24,555] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> n5.example.com/192.168.1.144:48818//192.168.1.144:9092
> (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> [2014-07-23 20:45:24,566] INFO finished ssl handshake for
> n5.example.com/192.168.1.144:48818//192.168.1.144:9092
> (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
>
> It's like it did the SSL piece twice :)
>
> Subsequent puts to the topic did not exhibit this behavior though:
>
> root@n5[937]:~/kafka_2.10-0-8-2-0.1.0.0> bin/kafka-console-producer.sh
> --broker-list n5:9092 --secure --client.security.file
> config/client.security.properties --topic test
> [2014-07-23 20:45:17,530] WARN Property topic is not valid
> (kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties)
> 1
> [2014-07-23 20:45:24,509] WARN Attempt to reinitialize auth context
> (kafka.network.security.SecureAuth$)
> 2
> 3
> 4
>
> Consuming worked with these options:
>
> root@n5[918]:~/kafka_2.10-0-8-2-0.1.0.0> bin/kafka-console-consumer.sh
> --topic test --zookeeper n5:2181 --from-beginning --security.config.file
> config/client.security.properties
> 1
> 2
> 3
> 4
> ^CConsumed 5 messages
>
> I hope that helps!
> Chris
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <dpram...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Anyone getting this issue. Is it something related to environment or it
> is
> > the code. Producer works fine when run with secure=false (no security)
> > mode.
> >
> >
> > pdeshmukh$ bin/kafka-console-producer.sh --broker-list
> localhost:9092:true
> > --topic secureTopic
> >
> > [2014-07-18 13:12:29,817] WARN Property topic is not valid
> > (kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties)
> >
> > Hare Krishna
> >
> > [2014-07-18 13:12:45,256] WARN Fetching topic metadata with correlation
> id
> > 0 for topics [Set(secureTopic)] from broker
> > [id:0,host:localhost,port:9092,secure:true] failed
> > (kafka.client.ClientUtils$)
> >
> > java.io.EOFException: Received -1 when reading from channel, socket has
> > likely been closed.
> >
> > at kafka.utils.Utils$.read(Utils.scala:381)
> >
> > at
> >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readFrom(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:67)
> >
> > at kafka.network.Receive$class.readCompletely(Transmission.scala:56)
> >
> > at
> >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readCompletely(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:29)
> >
> > at kafka.network.BlockingChannel.receive(BlockingChannel.scala:102)
> >
> > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.liftedTree1$1(SyncProducer.scala:79)
> >
> > at
> >
> >
> kafka.producer.SyncProducer.kafka$producer$SyncProducer$$doSend(SyncProducer.scala:76)
> >
> > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.send(SyncProducer.scala:117)
> >
> > at kafka.client.ClientUtils$.fetchTopicMetadata(ClientUtils.scala:58)
> >
> > at
> >
> kafka.producer.BrokerPartitionInfo.updateInfo(BrokerPartitionInfo.scala:82)
> >
> > at
> >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler$$anonfun$handle$1.apply$mcV$sp(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> >
> > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallow(Utils.scala:172)
> >
> > at kafka.utils.Logging$class.swallowError(Logging.scala:106)
> >
> > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallowError(Utils.scala:45)
> >
> > at
> >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler.handle(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> >
> > at
> >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.tryToHandle(ProducerSendThread.scala:104)
> >
> > at
> >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:87)
> >
> > at
> >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:67)
> >
> > at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.foreach(Stream.scala:526)
> >
> > at
> >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.processEvents(ProducerSendThread.scala:66)
> >
> > at
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.run(ProducerSendThread.scala:44)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <dpram...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Joe, I don't see any Out of memory error. Now I get exception
> when
> > > Producer fetches metadata for a topic
> > >
> > > Here is how I created the topic and run producer
> > >
> > > pdeshmukh$ bin/kafka-topics.sh --create --zookeeper localhost:2181
> > > --replication-factor 1 --partitions 1 --topic secureTopic
> > > Created topic "secureTopic".
> > >
> > > pdeshmukh$ bin/kafka-topics.sh --list --zookeeper localhost:2181
> > >
> > > secure.test
> > >
> > > secureTopic
> > >
> > > >> Run producer, tried both localhost:9092:true and localhost:9092
> > >
> > > pdeshmukh$ bin/kafka-console-producer.sh --broker-list
> > localhost:9092:true
> > > --topic secureTopic
> > >
> > > [2014-07-18 13:12:29,817] WARN Property topic is not valid
> > > (kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties)
> > >
> > > Hare Krishna
> > >
> > > [2014-07-18 13:12:45,256] WARN Fetching topic metadata with correlation
> > id
> > > 0 for topics [Set(secureTopic)] from broker
> > > [id:0,host:localhost,port:9092,secure:true] failed
> > > (kafka.client.ClientUtils$)
> > >
> > > java.io.EOFException: Received -1 when reading from channel, socket has
> > > likely been closed.
> > >
> > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.read(Utils.scala:381)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readFrom(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at kafka.network.Receive$class.readCompletely(Transmission.scala:56)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readCompletely(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:29)
> > >
> > > at kafka.network.BlockingChannel.receive(BlockingChannel.scala:102)
> > >
> > > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.liftedTree1$1(SyncProducer.scala:79)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.SyncProducer.kafka$producer$SyncProducer$$doSend(SyncProducer.scala:76)
> > >
> > > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.send(SyncProducer.scala:117)
> > >
> > > at kafka.client.ClientUtils$.fetchTopicMetadata(ClientUtils.scala:58)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.BrokerPartitionInfo.updateInfo(BrokerPartitionInfo.scala:82)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler$$anonfun$handle$1.apply$mcV$sp(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallow(Utils.scala:172)
> > >
> > > at kafka.utils.Logging$class.swallowError(Logging.scala:106)
> > >
> > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallowError(Utils.scala:45)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler.handle(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.tryToHandle(ProducerSendThread.scala:104)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:87)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.foreach(Stream.scala:526)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.processEvents(ProducerSendThread.scala:66)
> > >
> > > at
> > kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.run(ProducerSendThread.scala:44)
> > >
> > > [2014-07-18 13:12:45,258] ERROR fetching topic metadata for topics
> > > [Set(secureTopic)] from broker
> > > [ArrayBuffer(id:0,host:localhost,port:9092,secure:true)] failed
> > > (kafka.utils.Utils$)
> > >
> > > kafka.common.KafkaException: fetching topic metadata for topics
> > > [Set(secureTopic)] from broker
> > > [ArrayBuffer(id:0,host:localhost,port:9092,secure:true)] failed
> > >
> > > at kafka.client.ClientUtils$.fetchTopicMetadata(ClientUtils.scala:72)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.BrokerPartitionInfo.updateInfo(BrokerPartitionInfo.scala:82)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler$$anonfun$handle$1.apply$mcV$sp(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallow(Utils.scala:172)
> > >
> > > at kafka.utils.Logging$class.swallowError(Logging.scala:106)
> > >
> > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallowError(Utils.scala:45)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler.handle(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.tryToHandle(ProducerSendThread.scala:104)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:87)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.foreach(Stream.scala:526)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.processEvents(ProducerSendThread.scala:66)
> > >
> > > at
> > kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.run(ProducerSendThread.scala:44)
> > >
> > > Caused by: java.io.EOFException: Received -1 when reading from channel,
> > > socket has likely been closed.
> > >
> > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.read(Utils.scala:381)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readFrom(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at kafka.network.Receive$class.readCompletely(Transmission.scala:56)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readCompletely(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:29)
> > >
> > > at kafka.network.BlockingChannel.receive(BlockingChannel.scala:102)
> > >
> > > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.liftedTree1$1(SyncProducer.scala:79)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.SyncProducer.kafka$producer$SyncProducer$$doSend(SyncProducer.scala:76)
> > >
> > > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.send(SyncProducer.scala:117)
> > >
> > > at kafka.client.ClientUtils$.fetchTopicMetadata(ClientUtils.scala:58)
> > >
> > > ... 12 more
> > > [2014-07-18 13:12:45,337] WARN Fetching topic metadata with correlation
> > id
> > > 1 for topics [Set(secureTopic)] from broker
> > > [id:0,host:localhost,port:9092,secure:true] failed
> > > (kafka.client.ClientUtils$)
> > >
> > > 2014-07-18 13:12:46,282] ERROR Failed to send requests for topics
> > > secureTopic with correlation ids in [0,8]
> > > (kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler)
> > >
> > > [2014-07-18 13:12:46,283] ERROR Error in handling batch of 1 events
> > > (kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread)
> > >
> > > kafka.common.FailedToSendMessageException: Failed to send messages
> after
> > 3
> > > tries.
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler.handle(DefaultEventHandler.scala:90)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.tryToHandle(ProducerSendThread.scala:104)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:87)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.foreach(Stream.scala:526)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.processEvents(ProducerSendThread.scala:66)
> > >
> > > at
> > kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.run(ProducerSendThread.scala:44)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Joe Stein <joe.st...@stealth.ly>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Pramod,
> > >>
> > >> Can you increase KAFKA_HEAP_OPTS to lets say -Xmx1G in the
> > >> kafka-console-producer.sh to see if that gets you further along please
> > in
> > >> your testing?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> /*******************************************
> > >>  Joe Stein
> > >>  Founder, Principal Consultant
> > >>  Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> > >>  http://www.stealth.ly
> > >>  Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> > >> ********************************************/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Pramod Deshmukh <dpram...@gmail.com
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hello Raja/Joe,
> > >> > When I turn on security, i still get out of memory error on
> producer.
> > Is
> > >> > this something to do with keys? Is there any other way I can connect
> > to
> > >> > broker?
> > >> >
> > >> > *producer log*
> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:38:14,186] ERROR OOME with size 352518400
> > (kafka.network.
> > >> > BoundedByteBufferReceive)
> > >> > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
> > >> >
> > >> > *broker log*
> > >> >
> > >> > INFO begin ssl handshake for localhost/
> > 127.0.0.1:50199//127.0.0.1:9092
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <
> dpram...@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Correct, I don't see any exceptions when i turn off security.
> > >> Consumer is
> > >> > > able to consume the message.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I still see warning for topic property.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > [2014-07-17 18:04:38,360] WARN Property topic is not valid
> > >> > > (kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties)
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Rajasekar Elango <
> > >> > rela...@salesforce.com>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Can you try with turning off security to check if this error
> > happens
> > >> > only
> > >> > >> on secure mode?
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Thanks,
> > >> > >> Raja.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <
> > dpram...@gmail.com
> > >> >
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > Thanks Raja, it was helpful
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > Now I am able to start zookeeper and broker in secure mode
> ready
> > >> for
> > >> > SSL
> > >> > >> > handshake. I get *java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space*
> on
> > >> > >> producer.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > I using the default configuration and keystore. Is there
> anything
> > >> > >> missing
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *Start broker:*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *bin/kafka-server-start.sh config/server.properties*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *broker.log:*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,281] INFO zookeeper state changed
> > >> (SyncConnected)
> > >> > >> > (org.I0Itec.zkclient.ZkClient)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,523] INFO Loading log 'secure.test-0'
> > >> > >> > (kafka.log.LogManager)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,558] INFO Recovering unflushed segment 0
> in
> > >> log
> > >> > >> > secure.test-0. (kafka.log.Log)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,571] INFO Completed load of log
> > secure.test-0
> > >> > with
> > >> > >> log
> > >> > >> > end offset 0 (kafka.log.Log)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,582] INFO Starting log cleanup with a
> period
> > >> of
> > >> > >> 60000
> > >> > >> > ms. (kafka.log.LogManager)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,587] INFO Starting log flusher with a
> > default
> > >> > >> period
> > >> > >> > of 9223372036854775807 ms. (kafka.log.LogManager)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,614] INFO Initializing secure
> authentication
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SecureAuth$)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,678] INFO Secure authentication
> > initialization
> > >> > has
> > >> > >> > been successfully completed
> (kafka.network.security.SecureAuth$)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,691] INFO Awaiting socket connections on
> > >> > >> 0.0.0.0:9092
> > >> > >> > .
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.Acceptor)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,692] INFO [Socket Server on Broker 0],
> > Started
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.SocketServer)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,794] INFO Will not load MX4J,
> mx4j-tools.jar
> > >> is
> > >> > >> not in
> > >> > >> > the classpath (kafka.utils.Mx4jLoader$)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,837] INFO 0 successfully elected as leader
> > >> > >> > (kafka.server.ZookeeperLeaderElector)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:47,057] INFO Registered broker 0 at path
> > >> > >> /brokers/ids/0
> > >> > >> > with address 10.1.100.130:9092. (kafka.utils.ZkUtils$)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:47,059] INFO New leader is 0
> > >> > >> > (kafka.server.ZookeeperLeaderElector$LeaderChangeListener)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,068] INFO [Kafka Server 0], started
> > >> > >> > (kafka.server.KafkaServer)*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,383] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > /10.1.100.130:9092//10.1.100.130:51685
> > >> > >> > <http://10.1.100.130:9092//10.1.100.130:51685>
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,392] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51685//10.1.100.130:9092
> > >> > >> > <http://10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51685//10.1.100.130:9092>
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,465] INFO finished ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51685//10.1.100.130:9092
> > >> > >> > <http://10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51685//10.1.100.130:9092>
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,465] INFO finished ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > /10.1.100.130:9092//10.1.100.130:51685
> > >> > >> > <http://10.1.100.130:9092//10.1.100.130:51685>
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,617] INFO [ReplicaFetcherManager on
> broker
> > 0]
> > >> > >> Removed
> > >> > >> > fetcher for partitions  (kafka.server.ReplicaFetcherManager)*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,627] INFO [ReplicaFetcherManager on
> broker
> > 0]
> > >> > >> Added
> > >> > >> > fetcher for partitions List()
> > (kafka.server.ReplicaFetcherManager)*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,656] INFO [ReplicaFetcherManager on
> broker
> > 0]
> > >> > >> Removed
> > >> > >> > fetcher for partitions [secure.test,0]
> > >> > >> > (kafka.server.ReplicaFetcherManager)*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:15,970] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51689//10.1.100.130:9092
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:16,075] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51690//10.1.100.130:9092
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:16,434] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51691//10.1.100.130:9092
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:16,530] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51692//10.1.100.130:9092
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:16,743] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51693//10.1.100.130:9092
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:16,834] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51694//10.1.100.130:9092
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:17,043] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51695//10.1.100.130:9092
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:17,137] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51696//10.1.100.130:9092
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:17,342] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51697//10.1.100.130:9092
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *Start producer*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *bin/kafka-console-producer.sh --broker-list 10.1.100.130:9092
> > >> :true
> > >> > >> > --topic
> > >> > >> > secure.test*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *producer.log:*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > bin/kafka-console-producer.sh --broker-list 10.1.100.130:9092
> > :true
> > >> > >> --topic
> > >> > >> > secure.test
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:46,889] WARN Property topic is not valid
> > >> > >> > (kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > Hello Secure Kafka
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:38:14,186] ERROR OOME with size 352518400
> > >> > >> > (kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive)*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > *java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space*
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at java.nio.HeapByteBuffer.<init>(HeapByteBuffer.java:57)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at java.nio.ByteBuffer.allocate(ByteBuffer.java:331)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.byteBufferAllocate(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:80)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readFrom(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:63)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> kafka.network.Receive$class.readCompletely(Transmission.scala:56)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readCompletely(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:29)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > kafka.network.BlockingChannel.receive(BlockingChannel.scala:102)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > kafka.producer.SyncProducer.liftedTree1$1(SyncProducer.scala:79)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> kafka.producer.SyncProducer.kafka$producer$SyncProducer$$doSend(SyncProducer.scala:76)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.send(SyncProducer.scala:117)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> kafka.client.ClientUtils$.fetchTopicMetadata(ClientUtils.scala:58)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> kafka.producer.BrokerPartitionInfo.updateInfo(BrokerPartitionInfo.scala:82)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler$$anonfun$handle$1.apply$mcV$sp(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallow(Utils.scala:172)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at kafka.utils.Logging$class.swallowError(Logging.scala:106)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallowError(Utils.scala:45)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler.handle(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.tryToHandle(ProducerSendThread.scala:104)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:87)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:67)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.foreach(Stream.scala:526)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.processEvents(ProducerSendThread.scala:66)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > at
> > >> > >>
> > >>
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.run(ProducerSendThread.scala:44)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Rajasekar Elango <
> > >> > >> rela...@salesforce.com>
> > >> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > > Pramod,
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > I presented secure kafka configuration and usage at last meet
> > >> up. So
> > >> > >> hope
> > >> > >> > > this
> > >> > >> > > video recording <http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/48396701
> >would
> > >> > help.
> > >> > >> You
> > >> > >> > > can skip to about 59 min to jump to security talk.
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > >> > > Raja.
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <
> > >> > dpram...@gmail.com>
> > >> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > Hello Joe,
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > Is there a configuration or example to test Kafka security
> > >> piece?
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > Pramod
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <
> > >> > >> dpram...@gmail.com>
> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks Joe,
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > This branch works. I was able to proceed. I still had to
> > set
> > >> > scala
> > >> > >> > > > version
> > >> > >> > > > > to 2.9.2 in kafka-run-class.sh.
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Joe Stein <
> > >> > joe.st...@stealth.ly>
> > >> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> That is a very old branch.
> > >> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > >> Here is a more up to date one
> > >> > >> > > > >>
> https://github.com/stealthly/kafka/tree/v0.8.2_KAFKA-1477
> > >> > >> (needs to
> > >> > >> > > be
> > >> > >> > > > >> updated to latest trunk might have a chance to-do that
> > next
> > >> > >> week).
> > >> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > >> You should be using gradle now as per the README.
> > >> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > >> /*******************************************
> > >> > >> > > > >>  Joe Stein
> > >> > >> > > > >>  Founder, Principal Consultant
> > >> > >> > > > >>  Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> > >> > >> > > > >>  http://www.stealth.ly
> > >> > >> > > > >>  Twitter: @allthingshadoop <
> > >> > >> http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> > >> > >> > > > >> ********************************************/
> > >> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <
> > >> > >> > dpram...@gmail.com>
> > >> > >> > > > >> wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > >> > Thanks Joe for this,
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > I cloned this branch and tried to run zookeeper but I
> > get
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > Error: Could not find or load main class
> > >> > >> > > > >> > org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeerMain
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > I see scala version is still set to 2.8.0
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > if [ -z "$SCALA_VERSION" ]; then
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> >         SCALA_VERSION=2.8.0
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > fi
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > Then I installed sbt and scala and followed your
> > >> instructions
> > >> > >> for
> > >> > >> > > > >> different
> > >> > >> > > > >> > scala versions. I was able to bring zookeeper up but
> > >> brokers
> > >> > >> fail
> > >> > >> > to
> > >> > >> > > > >> start
> > >> > >> > > > >> > with error
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > Error: Could not find or load main class kafka.Kafka
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > I think I am doing something wrong. Can you please
> help
> > >> me?
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > Our current production setup is with 2.8.0 and want to
> > >> stick
> > >> > to
> > >> > >> > it.
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > Pramod
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Joe Stein <
> > >> > >> joe.st...@stealth.ly>
> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > Hi,I wanted to re-ignite the discussion around
> Apache
> > >> Kafka
> > >> > >> > > > Security.
> > >> > >> > > > >> >  This
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > is a huge bottleneck (non-starter in some cases)
> for a
> > >> lot
> > >> > of
> > >> > >> > > > >> > organizations
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > (due to regulatory, compliance and other
> > requirements).
> > >> > Below
> > >> > >> > are
> > >> > >> > > my
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > suggestions for specific changes in Kafka to
> > accommodate
> > >> > >> > security
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > requirements.  This comes from what folks are doing
> > "in
> > >> the
> > >> > >> > wild"
> > >> > >> > > to
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > workaround and implement security with Kafka as it
> is
> > >> today
> > >> > >> and
> > >> > >> > > also
> > >> > >> > > > >> > what I
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > have discovered from organizations about their
> > >> blockers. It
> > >> > >> also
> > >> > >> > > > >> picks up
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > from the wiki (which I should have time to update
> > later
> > >> in
> > >> > >> the
> > >> > >> > > week
> > >> > >> > > > >> based
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > on the below and feedback from the thread).
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > 1) Transport Layer Security (i.e. SSL)
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > This also includes client authentication in addition
> > to
> > >> > >> > in-transit
> > >> > >> > > > >> > security
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > layer.  This work has been picked up here
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1477
> and
> > do
> > >> > >> > > appreciate
> > >> > >> > > > >> any
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > thoughts, comments, feedback, tomatoes, whatever for
> > >> this
> > >> > >> patch.
> > >> > >> > >  It
> > >> > >> > > > >> is a
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > pickup from the fork of the work first done here
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> https://github.com/relango/kafka/tree/kafka_security.
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > 2) Data encryption at rest.
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > This is very important and something that can be
> > >> > facilitated
> > >> > >> > > within
> > >> > >> > > > >> the
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > wire protocol. It requires an additional map data
> > >> structure
> > >> > >> for
> > >> > >> > > the
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > "encrypted [data encryption key]". With this map
> > >> (either in
> > >> > >> your
> > >> > >> > > > >> object
> > >> > >> > > > >> > or
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > in the wire protocol) you can store the dynamically
> > >> > generated
> > >> > >> > > > >> symmetric
> > >> > >> > > > >> > key
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > (for each message) and then encrypt the data using
> > that
> > >> > >> > > dynamically
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > generated key.  You then encrypt the encryption key
> > >> using
> > >> > >> each
> > >> > >> > > > public
> > >> > >> > > > >> key
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > for whom is expected to be able to decrypt the
> > >> encryption
> > >> > >> key to
> > >> > >> > > > then
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > decrypt the message.  For each public key encrypted
> > >> > symmetric
> > >> > >> > key
> > >> > >> > > > >> (which
> > >> > >> > > > >> > is
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > now the "encrypted [data encryption key]" along with
> > >> which
> > >> > >> > public
> > >> > >> > > > key
> > >> > >> > > > >> it
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > was encrypted with for (so a map of [publicKey] =
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > encryptedDataEncryptionKey) as a chain.   Other
> > patterns
> > >> > can
> > >> > >> be
> > >> > >> > > > >> > implemented
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > but this is a pretty standard digital enveloping [0]
> > >> > pattern
> > >> > >> > with
> > >> > >> > > > >> only 1
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > field added. Other patterns should be able to use
> that
> > >> > field
> > >> > >> > to-do
> > >> > >> > > > >> their
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > implementation too.
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > 3) Non-repudiation and long term non-repudiation.
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > Non-repudiation is proving data hasn't changed.
>  This
> > is
> > >> > >> often
> > >> > >> > (if
> > >> > >> > > > not
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > always) done with x509 public certificates (chained
> > to a
> > >> > >> > > certificate
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > authority).
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > Long term non-repudiation is what happens when the
> > >> > >> certificates
> > >> > >> > of
> > >> > >> > > > the
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > certificate authority are expired (or revoked) and
> > >> > everything
> > >> > >> > ever
> > >> > >> > > > >> signed
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > (ever) with that certificate's public key then
> becomes
> > >> "no
> > >> > >> > longer
> > >> > >> > > > >> > provable
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > as ever being authentic".  That is where RFC3126 [1]
> > and
> > >> > >> RFC3161
> > >> > >> > > [2]
> > >> > >> > > > >> come
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > in (or worm drives [hardware], etc).
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > For either (or both) of these it is an operation of
> > the
> > >> > >> > encryptor
> > >> > >> > > to
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > sign/hash the data (with or without third party
> > trusted
> > >> > >> timestap
> > >> > >> > > of
> > >> > >> > > > >> the
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > signing event) and encrypt that with their own
> private
> > >> key
> > >> > >> and
> > >> > >> > > > >> distribute
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > the results (before and after encrypting if
> required)
> > >> along
> > >> > >> with
> > >> > >> > > > their
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > public key. This structure is a bit more complex but
> > >> > >> feasible,
> > >> > >> > it
> > >> > >> > > > is a
> > >> > >> > > > >> > map
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > of digital signature formats and the chain of dig
> sig
> > >> > >> > > attestations.
> > >> > >> > > > >>  The
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > map's key being the method (i.e. CRC32, PKCS7 [3],
> > >> > XmlDigSig
> > >> > >> > [4])
> > >> > >> > > > and
> > >> > >> > > > >> > then
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > a list of map where that key is "purpose" of
> signature
> > >> > (what
> > >> > >> > your
> > >> > >> > > > >> > attesting
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > too).  As a sibling field to the list another field
> > for
> > >> > "the
> > >> > >> > > > >> attester" as
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > bytes (e.g. their PKCS12 [5] for the map of PKCS7
> > >> > >> signatures).
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > 4) Authorization
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > We should have a policy of "404" for data, topics,
> > >> > partitions
> > >> > >> > > (etc)
> > >> > >> > > > if
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > authenticated connections do not have access.  In
> > >> "secure
> > >> > >> mode"
> > >> > >> > > any
> > >> > >> > > > >> non
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > authenticated connections should get a "404" type
> > >> message
> > >> > on
> > >> > >> > > > >> everything.
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > Knowing "something is there" is a security risk in
> > many
> > >> > uses
> > >> > >> > > cases.
> > >> > >> > > > >>  So
> > >> > >> > > > >> > if
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > you don't have access you don't even see it.  Baking
> > >> "that"
> > >> > >> into
> > >> > >> > > > Kafka
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > along with some interface for entitlement (access
> > >> > management)
> > >> > >> > > > systems
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > (pretty standard) is all that I think needs to be
> done
> > >> to
> > >> > the
> > >> > >> > core
> > >> > >> > > > >> > project.
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >  I want to tackle item later in the year after
> summer
> > >> after
> > >> > >> the
> > >> > >> > > > other
> > >> > >> > > > >> > three
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > are complete.
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > I look forward to thoughts on this and anyone else
> > >> > >> interested in
> > >> > >> > > > >> working
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > with us on these items.
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > [0]
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://www.emc.com/emc-plus/rsa-labs/standards-initiatives/what-is-a-digital-envelope.htm
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3126
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3161
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > [3]
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://www.emc.com/emc-plus/rsa-labs/standards-initiatives/pkcs-7-cryptographic-message-syntax-standar.htm
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML_Signature
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > [5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PKCS_12
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > /*******************************************
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >  Joe Stein
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >  Founder, Principal Consultant
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >  Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >  http://www.stealth.ly
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >  Twitter: @allthingshadoop <
> > >> > >> > > http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> > >> > >> > > > >> > > ********************************************/
> > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > --
> > >> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > >> > > Raja.
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> --
> > >> > >> Thanks,
> > >> > >> Raja.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to