We implemented security features on older snapshot version of 0.8 kafka.
But Joe Stein's organization rebased it to latest version of kafka
available at https://github.com/stealthly/kafka/tree/v0.8.2_KAFKA-1477.

Thanks,
Raja.


On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Calvin Lei <ckp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Raja,
>    Which Kafka version is your security enhancement based on?
>
> thanks,
> Cal
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Chris Neal <cwn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Pramod,
> >
> > I got that same error when following the configuration from Raja's
> > presentation earlier in this thread.  If you'll notice the usage for the
> > console_producer.sh, it is slightly different, which is also slightly
> > different than the scala code for the ConsoleProducer. :)
> >
> > When I changed this:
> >
> > bin/kafka-console-producer.sh --broker-list n5:9092:true --topic test
> >
> > to this:
> >
> > bin/kafka-console-producer.sh --broker-list n5:9092 --secure
> > --client.security.file config/client.security.properties --topic test
> >
> > I was able to push messages to the topic, although I got a WARN about the
> > property "topic" not being valid, even though it is required.
> >
> > Also, the Producer reported this warning to me:
> >
> > [2014-07-23 20:45:24,509] WARN Attempt to reinitialize auth context
> > (kafka.network.security.SecureAuth$)
> >
> > and the broker gave me this:
> > [2014-07-23 20:45:24,114] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > n5.example.com/192.168.1.144:48817//192.168.1.144:9092
> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > [2014-07-23 20:45:24,374] INFO finished ssl handshake for
> > n5.example.com/192.168.1.144:48817//192.168.1.144:9092
> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > [2014-07-23 20:45:24,493] INFO Closing socket connection to
> > n5.example.com/192.168.1.144. (kafka.network.Processor)
> > [2014-07-23 20:45:24,555] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > n5.example.com/192.168.1.144:48818//192.168.1.144:9092
> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > [2014-07-23 20:45:24,566] INFO finished ssl handshake for
> > n5.example.com/192.168.1.144:48818//192.168.1.144:9092
> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> >
> > It's like it did the SSL piece twice :)
> >
> > Subsequent puts to the topic did not exhibit this behavior though:
> >
> > root@n5[937]:~/kafka_2.10-0-8-2-0.1.0.0> bin/kafka-console-producer.sh
> > --broker-list n5:9092 --secure --client.security.file
> > config/client.security.properties --topic test
> > [2014-07-23 20:45:17,530] WARN Property topic is not valid
> > (kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties)
> > 1
> > [2014-07-23 20:45:24,509] WARN Attempt to reinitialize auth context
> > (kafka.network.security.SecureAuth$)
> > 2
> > 3
> > 4
> >
> > Consuming worked with these options:
> >
> > root@n5[918]:~/kafka_2.10-0-8-2-0.1.0.0> bin/kafka-console-consumer.sh
> > --topic test --zookeeper n5:2181 --from-beginning --security.config.file
> > config/client.security.properties
> > 1
> > 2
> > 3
> > 4
> > ^CConsumed 5 messages
> >
> > I hope that helps!
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <dpram...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone getting this issue. Is it something related to environment or it
> > is
> > > the code. Producer works fine when run with secure=false (no security)
> > > mode.
> > >
> > >
> > > pdeshmukh$ bin/kafka-console-producer.sh --broker-list
> > localhost:9092:true
> > > --topic secureTopic
> > >
> > > [2014-07-18 13:12:29,817] WARN Property topic is not valid
> > > (kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties)
> > >
> > > Hare Krishna
> > >
> > > [2014-07-18 13:12:45,256] WARN Fetching topic metadata with correlation
> > id
> > > 0 for topics [Set(secureTopic)] from broker
> > > [id:0,host:localhost,port:9092,secure:true] failed
> > > (kafka.client.ClientUtils$)
> > >
> > > java.io.EOFException: Received -1 when reading from channel, socket has
> > > likely been closed.
> > >
> > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.read(Utils.scala:381)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readFrom(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at kafka.network.Receive$class.readCompletely(Transmission.scala:56)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readCompletely(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:29)
> > >
> > > at kafka.network.BlockingChannel.receive(BlockingChannel.scala:102)
> > >
> > > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.liftedTree1$1(SyncProducer.scala:79)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.SyncProducer.kafka$producer$SyncProducer$$doSend(SyncProducer.scala:76)
> > >
> > > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.send(SyncProducer.scala:117)
> > >
> > > at kafka.client.ClientUtils$.fetchTopicMetadata(ClientUtils.scala:58)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.BrokerPartitionInfo.updateInfo(BrokerPartitionInfo.scala:82)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler$$anonfun$handle$1.apply$mcV$sp(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallow(Utils.scala:172)
> > >
> > > at kafka.utils.Logging$class.swallowError(Logging.scala:106)
> > >
> > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallowError(Utils.scala:45)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler.handle(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.tryToHandle(ProducerSendThread.scala:104)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:87)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:67)
> > >
> > > at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.foreach(Stream.scala:526)
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.processEvents(ProducerSendThread.scala:66)
> > >
> > > at
> > kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.run(ProducerSendThread.scala:44)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <dpram...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Joe, I don't see any Out of memory error. Now I get exception
> > when
> > > > Producer fetches metadata for a topic
> > > >
> > > > Here is how I created the topic and run producer
> > > >
> > > > pdeshmukh$ bin/kafka-topics.sh --create --zookeeper localhost:2181
> > > > --replication-factor 1 --partitions 1 --topic secureTopic
> > > > Created topic "secureTopic".
> > > >
> > > > pdeshmukh$ bin/kafka-topics.sh --list --zookeeper localhost:2181
> > > >
> > > > secure.test
> > > >
> > > > secureTopic
> > > >
> > > > >> Run producer, tried both localhost:9092:true and localhost:9092
> > > >
> > > > pdeshmukh$ bin/kafka-console-producer.sh --broker-list
> > > localhost:9092:true
> > > > --topic secureTopic
> > > >
> > > > [2014-07-18 13:12:29,817] WARN Property topic is not valid
> > > > (kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties)
> > > >
> > > > Hare Krishna
> > > >
> > > > [2014-07-18 13:12:45,256] WARN Fetching topic metadata with
> correlation
> > > id
> > > > 0 for topics [Set(secureTopic)] from broker
> > > > [id:0,host:localhost,port:9092,secure:true] failed
> > > > (kafka.client.ClientUtils$)
> > > >
> > > > java.io.EOFException: Received -1 when reading from channel, socket
> has
> > > > likely been closed.
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.read(Utils.scala:381)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readFrom(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:67)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.network.Receive$class.readCompletely(Transmission.scala:56)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readCompletely(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:29)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.network.BlockingChannel.receive(BlockingChannel.scala:102)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.liftedTree1$1(SyncProducer.scala:79)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.SyncProducer.kafka$producer$SyncProducer$$doSend(SyncProducer.scala:76)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.send(SyncProducer.scala:117)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.client.ClientUtils$.fetchTopicMetadata(ClientUtils.scala:58)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.BrokerPartitionInfo.updateInfo(BrokerPartitionInfo.scala:82)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler$$anonfun$handle$1.apply$mcV$sp(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallow(Utils.scala:172)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.utils.Logging$class.swallowError(Logging.scala:106)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallowError(Utils.scala:45)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler.handle(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.tryToHandle(ProducerSendThread.scala:104)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:87)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:67)
> > > >
> > > > at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.foreach(Stream.scala:526)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.processEvents(ProducerSendThread.scala:66)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.run(ProducerSendThread.scala:44)
> > > >
> > > > [2014-07-18 13:12:45,258] ERROR fetching topic metadata for topics
> > > > [Set(secureTopic)] from broker
> > > > [ArrayBuffer(id:0,host:localhost,port:9092,secure:true)] failed
> > > > (kafka.utils.Utils$)
> > > >
> > > > kafka.common.KafkaException: fetching topic metadata for topics
> > > > [Set(secureTopic)] from broker
> > > > [ArrayBuffer(id:0,host:localhost,port:9092,secure:true)] failed
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.client.ClientUtils$.fetchTopicMetadata(ClientUtils.scala:72)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.BrokerPartitionInfo.updateInfo(BrokerPartitionInfo.scala:82)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler$$anonfun$handle$1.apply$mcV$sp(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallow(Utils.scala:172)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.utils.Logging$class.swallowError(Logging.scala:106)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallowError(Utils.scala:45)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler.handle(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.tryToHandle(ProducerSendThread.scala:104)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:87)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:67)
> > > >
> > > > at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.foreach(Stream.scala:526)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.processEvents(ProducerSendThread.scala:66)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.run(ProducerSendThread.scala:44)
> > > >
> > > > Caused by: java.io.EOFException: Received -1 when reading from
> channel,
> > > > socket has likely been closed.
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.utils.Utils$.read(Utils.scala:381)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readFrom(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:67)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.network.Receive$class.readCompletely(Transmission.scala:56)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readCompletely(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:29)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.network.BlockingChannel.receive(BlockingChannel.scala:102)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.liftedTree1$1(SyncProducer.scala:79)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.SyncProducer.kafka$producer$SyncProducer$$doSend(SyncProducer.scala:76)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.send(SyncProducer.scala:117)
> > > >
> > > > at kafka.client.ClientUtils$.fetchTopicMetadata(ClientUtils.scala:58)
> > > >
> > > > ... 12 more
> > > > [2014-07-18 13:12:45,337] WARN Fetching topic metadata with
> correlation
> > > id
> > > > 1 for topics [Set(secureTopic)] from broker
> > > > [id:0,host:localhost,port:9092,secure:true] failed
> > > > (kafka.client.ClientUtils$)
> > > >
> > > > 2014-07-18 13:12:46,282] ERROR Failed to send requests for topics
> > > > secureTopic with correlation ids in [0,8]
> > > > (kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler)
> > > >
> > > > [2014-07-18 13:12:46,283] ERROR Error in handling batch of 1 events
> > > > (kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread)
> > > >
> > > > kafka.common.FailedToSendMessageException: Failed to send messages
> > after
> > > 3
> > > > tries.
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler.handle(DefaultEventHandler.scala:90)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.tryToHandle(ProducerSendThread.scala:104)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:87)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:67)
> > > >
> > > > at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.foreach(Stream.scala:526)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.processEvents(ProducerSendThread.scala:66)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.run(ProducerSendThread.scala:44)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Joe Stein <joe.st...@stealth.ly>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Pramod,
> > > >>
> > > >> Can you increase KAFKA_HEAP_OPTS to lets say -Xmx1G in the
> > > >> kafka-console-producer.sh to see if that gets you further along
> please
> > > in
> > > >> your testing?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks!
> > > >>
> > > >> /*******************************************
> > > >>  Joe Stein
> > > >>  Founder, Principal Consultant
> > > >>  Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> > > >>  http://www.stealth.ly
> > > >>  Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> > > >> ********************************************/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Pramod Deshmukh <
> dpram...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hello Raja/Joe,
> > > >> > When I turn on security, i still get out of memory error on
> > producer.
> > > Is
> > > >> > this something to do with keys? Is there any other way I can
> connect
> > > to
> > > >> > broker?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > *producer log*
> > > >> > [2014-07-17 15:38:14,186] ERROR OOME with size 352518400
> > > (kafka.network.
> > > >> > BoundedByteBufferReceive)
> > > >> > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
> > > >> >
> > > >> > *broker log*
> > > >> >
> > > >> > INFO begin ssl handshake for localhost/
> > > 127.0.0.1:50199//127.0.0.1:9092
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <
> > dpram...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Correct, I don't see any exceptions when i turn off security.
> > > >> Consumer is
> > > >> > > able to consume the message.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I still see warning for topic property.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > [2014-07-17 18:04:38,360] WARN Property topic is not valid
> > > >> > > (kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Rajasekar Elango <
> > > >> > rela...@salesforce.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> Can you try with turning off security to check if this error
> > > happens
> > > >> > only
> > > >> > >> on secure mode?
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Thanks,
> > > >> > >> Raja.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <
> > > dpram...@gmail.com
> > > >> >
> > > >> > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> > Thanks Raja, it was helpful
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > Now I am able to start zookeeper and broker in secure mode
> > ready
> > > >> for
> > > >> > SSL
> > > >> > >> > handshake. I get *java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap
> space*
> > on
> > > >> > >> producer.
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > I using the default configuration and keystore. Is there
> > anything
> > > >> > >> missing
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *Start broker:*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *bin/kafka-server-start.sh config/server.properties*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *broker.log:*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,281] INFO zookeeper state changed
> > > >> (SyncConnected)
> > > >> > >> > (org.I0Itec.zkclient.ZkClient)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,523] INFO Loading log 'secure.test-0'
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.log.LogManager)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,558] INFO Recovering unflushed segment 0
> > in
> > > >> log
> > > >> > >> > secure.test-0. (kafka.log.Log)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,571] INFO Completed load of log
> > > secure.test-0
> > > >> > with
> > > >> > >> log
> > > >> > >> > end offset 0 (kafka.log.Log)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,582] INFO Starting log cleanup with a
> > period
> > > >> of
> > > >> > >> 60000
> > > >> > >> > ms. (kafka.log.LogManager)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,587] INFO Starting log flusher with a
> > > default
> > > >> > >> period
> > > >> > >> > of 9223372036854775807 ms. (kafka.log.LogManager)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,614] INFO Initializing secure
> > authentication
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SecureAuth$)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,678] INFO Secure authentication
> > > initialization
> > > >> > has
> > > >> > >> > been successfully completed
> > (kafka.network.security.SecureAuth$)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,691] INFO Awaiting socket connections on
> > > >> > >> 0.0.0.0:9092
> > > >> > >> > .
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.Acceptor)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,692] INFO [Socket Server on Broker 0],
> > > Started
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.SocketServer)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,794] INFO Will not load MX4J,
> > mx4j-tools.jar
> > > >> is
> > > >> > >> not in
> > > >> > >> > the classpath (kafka.utils.Mx4jLoader$)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:46,837] INFO 0 successfully elected as
> leader
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.server.ZookeeperLeaderElector)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:47,057] INFO Registered broker 0 at path
> > > >> > >> /brokers/ids/0
> > > >> > >> > with address 10.1.100.130:9092. (kafka.utils.ZkUtils$)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:34:47,059] INFO New leader is 0
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.server.ZookeeperLeaderElector$LeaderChangeListener)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,068] INFO [Kafka Server 0], started
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.server.KafkaServer)*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,383] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > /10.1.100.130:9092//10.1.100.130:51685
> > > >> > >> > <http://10.1.100.130:9092//10.1.100.130:51685>
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,392] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51685//10.1.100.130:9092
> > > >> > >> > <http://10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51685//10.1.100.130:9092>
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,465] INFO finished ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51685//10.1.100.130:9092
> > > >> > >> > <http://10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51685//10.1.100.130:9092>
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,465] INFO finished ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > /10.1.100.130:9092//10.1.100.130:51685
> > > >> > >> > <http://10.1.100.130:9092//10.1.100.130:51685>
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,617] INFO [ReplicaFetcherManager on
> > broker
> > > 0]
> > > >> > >> Removed
> > > >> > >> > fetcher for partitions  (kafka.server.ReplicaFetcherManager)*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,627] INFO [ReplicaFetcherManager on
> > broker
> > > 0]
> > > >> > >> Added
> > > >> > >> > fetcher for partitions List()
> > > (kafka.server.ReplicaFetcherManager)*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:34:47,656] INFO [ReplicaFetcherManager on
> > broker
> > > 0]
> > > >> > >> Removed
> > > >> > >> > fetcher for partitions [secure.test,0]
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.server.ReplicaFetcherManager)*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:15,970] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51689//10.1.100.130:9092
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:16,075] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51690//10.1.100.130:9092
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:16,434] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51691//10.1.100.130:9092
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:16,530] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51692//10.1.100.130:9092
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:16,743] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51693//10.1.100.130:9092
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:16,834] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51694//10.1.100.130:9092
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:17,043] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51695//10.1.100.130:9092
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:17,137] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51696//10.1.100.130:9092
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:17,342] INFO begin ssl handshake for
> > > >> > >> > 10.1.100.130/10.1.100.130:51697//10.1.100.130:9092
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.security.SSLSocketChannel)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *Start producer*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *bin/kafka-console-producer.sh --broker-list
> 10.1.100.130:9092
> > > >> :true
> > > >> > >> > --topic
> > > >> > >> > secure.test*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *producer.log:*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > bin/kafka-console-producer.sh --broker-list
> 10.1.100.130:9092
> > > :true
> > > >> > >> --topic
> > > >> > >> > secure.test
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [2014-07-17 15:37:46,889] WARN Property topic is not valid
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > Hello Secure Kafka
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *[2014-07-17 15:38:14,186] ERROR OOME with size 352518400
> > > >> > >> > (kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive)*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > *java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space*
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at java.nio.HeapByteBuffer.<init>(HeapByteBuffer.java:57)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at java.nio.ByteBuffer.allocate(ByteBuffer.java:331)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.byteBufferAllocate(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:80)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readFrom(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:63)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> kafka.network.Receive$class.readCompletely(Transmission.scala:56)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> kafka.network.BoundedByteBufferReceive.readCompletely(BoundedByteBufferReceive.scala:29)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > kafka.network.BlockingChannel.receive(BlockingChannel.scala:102)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > kafka.producer.SyncProducer.liftedTree1$1(SyncProducer.scala:79)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.SyncProducer.kafka$producer$SyncProducer$$doSend(SyncProducer.scala:76)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at kafka.producer.SyncProducer.send(SyncProducer.scala:117)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> kafka.client.ClientUtils$.fetchTopicMetadata(ClientUtils.scala:58)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.BrokerPartitionInfo.updateInfo(BrokerPartitionInfo.scala:82)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler$$anonfun$handle$1.apply$mcV$sp(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallow(Utils.scala:172)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at kafka.utils.Logging$class.swallowError(Logging.scala:106)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at kafka.utils.Utils$.swallowError(Utils.scala:45)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.DefaultEventHandler.handle(DefaultEventHandler.scala:67)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.tryToHandle(ProducerSendThread.scala:104)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:87)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread$$anonfun$processEvents$3.apply(ProducerSendThread.scala:67)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> scala.collection.immutable.Stream.foreach(Stream.scala:526)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.processEvents(ProducerSendThread.scala:66)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > at
> > > >> > >>
> > > >>
> > kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread.run(ProducerSendThread.scala:44)
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Rajasekar Elango <
> > > >> > >> rela...@salesforce.com>
> > > >> > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > Pramod,
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > I presented secure kafka configuration and usage at last
> meet
> > > >> up. So
> > > >> > >> hope
> > > >> > >> > > this
> > > >> > >> > > video recording <http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/48396701
> > >would
> > > >> > help.
> > > >> > >> You
> > > >> > >> > > can skip to about 59 min to jump to security talk.
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > >> > > Raja.
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <
> > > >> > dpram...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > Hello Joe,
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > Is there a configuration or example to test Kafka
> security
> > > >> piece?
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > Pramod
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <
> > > >> > >> dpram...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > Thanks Joe,
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > This branch works. I was able to proceed. I still had
> to
> > > set
> > > >> > scala
> > > >> > >> > > > version
> > > >> > >> > > > > to 2.9.2 in kafka-run-class.sh.
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Joe Stein <
> > > >> > joe.st...@stealth.ly>
> > > >> > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> That is a very old branch.
> > > >> > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > >> Here is a more up to date one
> > > >> > >> > > > >>
> > https://github.com/stealthly/kafka/tree/v0.8.2_KAFKA-1477
> > > >> > >> (needs to
> > > >> > >> > > be
> > > >> > >> > > > >> updated to latest trunk might have a chance to-do that
> > > next
> > > >> > >> week).
> > > >> > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > >> You should be using gradle now as per the README.
> > > >> > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > >> /*******************************************
> > > >> > >> > > > >>  Joe Stein
> > > >> > >> > > > >>  Founder, Principal Consultant
> > > >> > >> > > > >>  Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> > > >> > >> > > > >>  http://www.stealth.ly
> > > >> > >> > > > >>  Twitter: @allthingshadoop <
> > > >> > >> http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> > > >> > >> > > > >> ********************************************/
> > > >> > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Pramod Deshmukh <
> > > >> > >> > dpram...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > >> > > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > Thanks Joe for this,
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > I cloned this branch and tried to run zookeeper but
> I
> > > get
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > Error: Could not find or load main class
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeerMain
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > I see scala version is still set to 2.8.0
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > if [ -z "$SCALA_VERSION" ]; then
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >         SCALA_VERSION=2.8.0
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > fi
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > Then I installed sbt and scala and followed your
> > > >> instructions
> > > >> > >> for
> > > >> > >> > > > >> different
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > scala versions. I was able to bring zookeeper up but
> > > >> brokers
> > > >> > >> fail
> > > >> > >> > to
> > > >> > >> > > > >> start
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > with error
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > Error: Could not find or load main class kafka.Kafka
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > I think I am doing something wrong. Can you please
> > help
> > > >> me?
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > Our current production setup is with 2.8.0 and want
> to
> > > >> stick
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > >> > it.
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > Pramod
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Joe Stein <
> > > >> > >> joe.st...@stealth.ly>
> > > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > Hi,I wanted to re-ignite the discussion around
> > Apache
> > > >> Kafka
> > > >> > >> > > > Security.
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >  This
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > is a huge bottleneck (non-starter in some cases)
> > for a
> > > >> lot
> > > >> > of
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > organizations
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > (due to regulatory, compliance and other
> > > requirements).
> > > >> > Below
> > > >> > >> > are
> > > >> > >> > > my
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > suggestions for specific changes in Kafka to
> > > accommodate
> > > >> > >> > security
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > requirements.  This comes from what folks are
> doing
> > > "in
> > > >> the
> > > >> > >> > wild"
> > > >> > >> > > to
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > workaround and implement security with Kafka as it
> > is
> > > >> today
> > > >> > >> and
> > > >> > >> > > also
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > what I
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > have discovered from organizations about their
> > > >> blockers. It
> > > >> > >> also
> > > >> > >> > > > >> picks up
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > from the wiki (which I should have time to update
> > > later
> > > >> in
> > > >> > >> the
> > > >> > >> > > week
> > > >> > >> > > > >> based
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > on the below and feedback from the thread).
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > 1) Transport Layer Security (i.e. SSL)
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > This also includes client authentication in
> addition
> > > to
> > > >> > >> > in-transit
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > security
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > layer.  This work has been picked up here
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1477
> > and
> > > do
> > > >> > >> > > appreciate
> > > >> > >> > > > >> any
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > thoughts, comments, feedback, tomatoes, whatever
> for
> > > >> this
> > > >> > >> patch.
> > > >> > >> > >  It
> > > >> > >> > > > >> is a
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > pickup from the fork of the work first done here
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > https://github.com/relango/kafka/tree/kafka_security.
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > 2) Data encryption at rest.
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > This is very important and something that can be
> > > >> > facilitated
> > > >> > >> > > within
> > > >> > >> > > > >> the
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > wire protocol. It requires an additional map data
> > > >> structure
> > > >> > >> for
> > > >> > >> > > the
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > "encrypted [data encryption key]". With this map
> > > >> (either in
> > > >> > >> your
> > > >> > >> > > > >> object
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > or
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > in the wire protocol) you can store the
> dynamically
> > > >> > generated
> > > >> > >> > > > >> symmetric
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > key
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > (for each message) and then encrypt the data using
> > > that
> > > >> > >> > > dynamically
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > generated key.  You then encrypt the encryption
> key
> > > >> using
> > > >> > >> each
> > > >> > >> > > > public
> > > >> > >> > > > >> key
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > for whom is expected to be able to decrypt the
> > > >> encryption
> > > >> > >> key to
> > > >> > >> > > > then
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > decrypt the message.  For each public key
> encrypted
> > > >> > symmetric
> > > >> > >> > key
> > > >> > >> > > > >> (which
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > is
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > now the "encrypted [data encryption key]" along
> with
> > > >> which
> > > >> > >> > public
> > > >> > >> > > > key
> > > >> > >> > > > >> it
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > was encrypted with for (so a map of [publicKey] =
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > encryptedDataEncryptionKey) as a chain.   Other
> > > patterns
> > > >> > can
> > > >> > >> be
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > implemented
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > but this is a pretty standard digital enveloping
> [0]
> > > >> > pattern
> > > >> > >> > with
> > > >> > >> > > > >> only 1
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > field added. Other patterns should be able to use
> > that
> > > >> > field
> > > >> > >> > to-do
> > > >> > >> > > > >> their
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > implementation too.
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > 3) Non-repudiation and long term non-repudiation.
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > Non-repudiation is proving data hasn't changed.
> >  This
> > > is
> > > >> > >> often
> > > >> > >> > (if
> > > >> > >> > > > not
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > always) done with x509 public certificates
> (chained
> > > to a
> > > >> > >> > > certificate
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > authority).
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > Long term non-repudiation is what happens when the
> > > >> > >> certificates
> > > >> > >> > of
> > > >> > >> > > > the
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > certificate authority are expired (or revoked) and
> > > >> > everything
> > > >> > >> > ever
> > > >> > >> > > > >> signed
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > (ever) with that certificate's public key then
> > becomes
> > > >> "no
> > > >> > >> > longer
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > provable
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > as ever being authentic".  That is where RFC3126
> [1]
> > > and
> > > >> > >> RFC3161
> > > >> > >> > > [2]
> > > >> > >> > > > >> come
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > in (or worm drives [hardware], etc).
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > For either (or both) of these it is an operation
> of
> > > the
> > > >> > >> > encryptor
> > > >> > >> > > to
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > sign/hash the data (with or without third party
> > > trusted
> > > >> > >> timestap
> > > >> > >> > > of
> > > >> > >> > > > >> the
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > signing event) and encrypt that with their own
> > private
> > > >> key
> > > >> > >> and
> > > >> > >> > > > >> distribute
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > the results (before and after encrypting if
> > required)
> > > >> along
> > > >> > >> with
> > > >> > >> > > > their
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > public key. This structure is a bit more complex
> but
> > > >> > >> feasible,
> > > >> > >> > it
> > > >> > >> > > > is a
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > map
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > of digital signature formats and the chain of dig
> > sig
> > > >> > >> > > attestations.
> > > >> > >> > > > >>  The
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > map's key being the method (i.e. CRC32, PKCS7 [3],
> > > >> > XmlDigSig
> > > >> > >> > [4])
> > > >> > >> > > > and
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > then
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > a list of map where that key is "purpose" of
> > signature
> > > >> > (what
> > > >> > >> > your
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > attesting
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > too).  As a sibling field to the list another
> field
> > > for
> > > >> > "the
> > > >> > >> > > > >> attester" as
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > bytes (e.g. their PKCS12 [5] for the map of PKCS7
> > > >> > >> signatures).
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > 4) Authorization
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > We should have a policy of "404" for data, topics,
> > > >> > partitions
> > > >> > >> > > (etc)
> > > >> > >> > > > if
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > authenticated connections do not have access.  In
> > > >> "secure
> > > >> > >> mode"
> > > >> > >> > > any
> > > >> > >> > > > >> non
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > authenticated connections should get a "404" type
> > > >> message
> > > >> > on
> > > >> > >> > > > >> everything.
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > Knowing "something is there" is a security risk in
> > > many
> > > >> > uses
> > > >> > >> > > cases.
> > > >> > >> > > > >>  So
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > if
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > you don't have access you don't even see it.
>  Baking
> > > >> "that"
> > > >> > >> into
> > > >> > >> > > > Kafka
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > along with some interface for entitlement (access
> > > >> > management)
> > > >> > >> > > > systems
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > (pretty standard) is all that I think needs to be
> > done
> > > >> to
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > >> > core
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > project.
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >  I want to tackle item later in the year after
> > summer
> > > >> after
> > > >> > >> the
> > > >> > >> > > > other
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > three
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > are complete.
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > I look forward to thoughts on this and anyone else
> > > >> > >> interested in
> > > >> > >> > > > >> working
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > with us on these items.
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > [0]
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://www.emc.com/emc-plus/rsa-labs/standards-initiatives/what-is-a-digital-envelope.htm
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3126
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3161
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > [3]
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://www.emc.com/emc-plus/rsa-labs/standards-initiatives/pkcs-7-cryptographic-message-syntax-standar.htm
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML_Signature
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > [5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PKCS_12
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > /*******************************************
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >  Joe Stein
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >  Founder, Principal Consultant
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >  Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >  http://www.stealth.ly
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >  Twitter: @allthingshadoop <
> > > >> > >> > > http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > ********************************************/
> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > --
> > > >> > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > >> > > Raja.
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> --
> > > >> > >> Thanks,
> > > >> > >> Raja.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Thanks,
Raja.

Reply via email to